Tag Archive: WTF

Clorox Thinks Men Are Useless

While watching Mad Men tonight I saw an ad from Clorox that disappointed the hell out of me. Men and Dads specifically, never get any respect from advertisers. We’re often characterized as bumbling idiots who can’t do anything except drink beer and drive cars. This new ad from Clorox had me hooked and leaning forward. I loved the time lapse look and the voice over was perfectly in tune with the animation. Then, roughly 13 seconds into the ad, I had a “WTF, are you serious” moment. The copy reads, “Laundry is not new. your mother, your grandmother, her mother, they all did the laundry…MAYBE EVEN A MAN OR TWO.”

Wow. Wow. I thought I had misheard the ad, so I went out to YouTube to find it. Sadly, I had heard correctly. As a dad, I find the line utterly and completely disrespectful. I do 75% of the laundry in my house. I know several men who do their fair share of laundry. To characterize men as people who don’t do laundry and women as the only people who do is insulting to both genders. Clearly, Clorox, hasn’t gotten the memo about the changing American family. Their time laps commercial seems stuck in the 1950s.

Since Clorox obviously doesn’t think I’m useful, I’ll be switching to private label and the competition.

I Don’t Want A Handout

I don’t want a handout.  Never have.  Never will.  I recently read a thoroughly disappointing post from Allyson Kapin at Fast Company.  In her post she essentially argues for a quote system that would ensure women are equally represented on panels at tech conferences.  Say what?  Yeap, you heard it.

A quota system doesn’t ensure equality, what it ensures is mediocrity.  I’m what the kids might call, “ethnic.”  Yet, I’ve never played the “race card” to gain an advantage.  Never.  Not once.  Didn’t do it to score better and more scholarships for college…or better yet to gain admittance into a college.  I’ve never played the card to score a job or get invited to a conference.

You won’t find me bemoaning the lack of so called minorities in the advertising business.  In fact, my thoughts on the matter are the same as my thoughts about women being invited to tech conferences: I want the best of the best, independent of race, color, creed, religion, gender, etc.

Why is that so hard?  Why I submitted my presenter/speaker application to BlogWorld and was turned down, I was disappointed.  But, instead of taking to the streets and demanding more ethnic representation at conferences, I hunkered down and tried to improve my work so that when I submit my application next year, I get accepted.

I don’t want a handout and neither should you.  You should want to be judged on the merit of your work, capabilities, skill, and value – not your gender, color, race, etc.  Would you really want to speak at a conference knowing that you’re only there to fill a quota and appease some loud mouth group/person that’s stumping for more representation of “their” group?  I wouldn’t.  If you do, you’re taking the easy way out and your work and talent will suffer for it.

I don’t want a hand out.

In The Wide Open Web Everyone’s Watching

As I wrote in my contribution to The Project 100, “we all have a role to play in the community.” It’s true we do. While it’s easy to jump all over a company’s mistake on the web, we also need to realize that un-constructive criticism and carrying pitch forks are not productive roles. But, too often like sharks that smell blood in the water, we hunt down the victim du jour and tear them apart. I’ve seen it happen so many times, with my favorite example being the Motrin Moms fiasco.

Well this weekend I got to watch another insane situation play out.  Rather than try and describe it, I’ll let you read the actual exchange between a Best Buy Customer and Barry Judge the CMO of Best Buy.

So let’s break this down and try to keep a level head:

  1. Barry is pretty well invested in the social space.  He has his own blog and openly tweets and interacts with colleagues, customers, etc.  For the most part he’s a shining example of why more C-level executives need to be engaging on platforms like twitter.
  2. Doug is more than a customer; he’s a pretty savvy guy who knows the power of social media.  That’s why he contacted Barry directly.
  3. Doug’s initial tweet could have been tempered to something like “Had an interesting recent situation with Best Buy. Online prices aren’t the same as in store.  Is that by design?”
  4. Barry clearly was irritated, but could have defused the situation by saying something to the effect of “140 characters is too short to discuss business rationale for this approach. will acknowledge in an upcoming blog post.”  Ideally, Barry would have gotten on the phone with Doug, but I’ have a better chance of hitting lotto than that happening.
  5. Barry goes on the defensive and reads into “tone.”  That’s a cardinal sin on the web.  Tone is the one thing you try to avoid getting wrapped up in because it’s nearly impossible to read it correctly.  My general rule of thumb is to assume positive intent.  Barry clearly wasn’t doing that.
  6. Where the situation gets funny and sad is after Barry realizes Doug not only knows retail, but knows Best Buy’s category inside and out.  So rather than engage with a worthy “adversary” Barry decides to get off one last zinger and then abandon the conversation.  I wonder if this is what happens in real meetings at Best Buy.

Regardless of who you think was right, the real take away here is that everything on the internet is viewable and shareable.  Assume that everyone is watching your every move.

I’m sure others will go all hyperbole and look at this as a lightening rod  for how bad Best Buy’s customer service (I mean obviously even the CMO doesn’t get it) and how Barry doesn’t get social media.  Others will go way off the deep end and demand a formal apology from Barry; guess what?  That’s not going to happen either.

As for me, I see this as a blip on the radar and nothing more.  Maybe Barry was having a bad day.  We’ve all had them.  Was he in the wrong on this one?  You bet.  Has he been wrong before?  Yes, absolutely.  Have I had first hand experience of him being less than “social” with me?  Definitely.  But, I have to say, his continued contributions in this space far outweigh (for now) his mistakes.  The web is a fickle place.  One minute you’re a hero and the next a villain.  While Barry Judge generally gets to play the role of hero, he was no doubt the villain in this situation.

As a side note….I think Doug is 100% in the right regarding pricing.  If you’re a click and mortar operation like Best Buy, the price should be the same online and in store for every product.  Even if you argue that e-commerce and traditional retail are different business models, the fact you can order online and pick up in store at the reduced price proves (in my mind) that Best Buy was most definitely in the wrong with their approach.

People Who Drive With Dogs On Their Lap

In many states talking with your cel-phone (non hands free) and texting while driving is illegal. Personally, I have no problem with this, but I think it should be extended to eating while driving. Eating while driving is much more dangerous than talking on the phone while driving.

Ok, that said, the thing that has annoyed me for years are the people who drive while letting their dogs site on their lap. Talk about dangerous, that’s really dangerous. Plus, when you let people like Jessica Simpson (who can’t walk and talk at the same time) drive while a dog is on her lap you could end up with some serious carnage.

 

Jessica Simpson

Jessica Simpson

I was really surprised to see The Governator veto a bill in California that would have made driving with pets on your lap illegal.  He already passed laws that prohibit texting and talking on the phone while driving.  WTF?

Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld Microsoft Ad – Part II

As I discussed early and often, the new work is bad. I mean like really bad. Some people have argued, you need to give it time because that was only the first chapter. Ok, well here is chapter 2:

You can’t be serious? Microsoft paid for this?

Great Product Placement?

Product placement is an interesting business.  When Michael Phelps wears a Speedo swimsuit it means something.  When Kobe is featured in a pair of Nike shoes, ditto.  The list goes on an on.  The one product placement that has me perplexed is the Chinese Olympic Anti-Terror Force’s use of the Segway.  Yes, that Segway.  Don’t believe me?  Check out this photo.

 

Segway

Segway

Am I now supposed to want a Segway because people who shoot other people for a living use them?  I’m just seriously conflicted on this example of product placement, because I have no idea why it makes sense.  Thoughts?

Feist on Sesame Street

I don’t know why, but this makes me smile.

Hitler and Twitter

Yes, I said Hitler and Twitter.  I really needed a pick me up today and the guys over at Crunchgear delivered in spades.

Bert and Ernie Gangster Rap

Ahh I love how this some how work…

Paris Hilton’s Response to McCain

I can’t believe I’m actually posting something positive about Paris Hilton, but here you go.

See more funny videos at Funny or Die

This was in response to this video.

About
Interactive marketer, innovator, boat rocker, continuous learner, movie lover, risk taker, dad and all around good guy. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »