Mayor Bloomberg of New York City recently appointed Rachel Sterne as the city’s first Chief Digital Officer. She’s 27. A few months ago Maureen Sullivan was named AOL’s Chief Marketing Officer. She’s 28. The backlash these two women have ensured is nothing short of staggering. And the topic of conversation is about their age. Because, you know…they’re soooooo young. Well, at least that seems to be the prevailing thought. Not surprisingly, the feedback is coming from people over the age of 30.
The reason I left Fallon was because it was clear my age…rather my youth was holding me back. I came back from a business trip in San Francisco with Macromedia (now Adobe). It was a great set of meetings. I was 22 at the time and had been working with Fallon as a full time employee for 4 years. I was leading all the interactive work for the account at the time. My boss and mentor sat me down and explained to me that Macromedia had asked for someone to replace me. Not, because of my performance. They asked for someone with more “salt and pepper.” That’s right a progressive internet and software development company, had a problem with my age and youth. Sad, really. Fallon of course backed the decision, making it an easy choice to leave when I was recruited by an internet startup company in Chicago. The rest is history.
I’m 31 now. No longer ashamed of my age. And let me tell you for a long time I was most definitely ashamed. I kept that information hidden. Why? Because there are people out there, even today in 2011, who still believe that age some how maps to experience and ability. Sorry, I just don’t buy it.
Instead of dissecting the age of Rachel and Maureen, shouldn’t we be dissecting their qualifications? After all, isn’t age just supposed to be a number?










