Tag Archive: social

Moments Happen Every Day

As we move to an age of what some are calling “real time marketing” we need to consider how to make our marketing more meaningful. This past Super Bowl was a tipping point for brands who might have been on the fence about social media marketing. Efforts by Audi, Oreo and Walgreens highlighted how providing quick and contextual marketing during an event can breakthrough. This post by Jay Baer does a great job of highlighting how hard it is to do great marketing. Notice, I didn’t say great social marketing or great “real time marketing.” I said great marketing. Getting to great marketing is tough. It takes a near perfect storm of the right brand, the right team, the right opportunity and the right stage.

The key for making a lot of this work is being honest about the social currency your brand has. Not all brands have a natural social currency that leads to a natural intersection of pop culture (eg The Oscars) and marketing. Additionally, I can’t stress enough the importance of planning. “Real Time Marketing” or whatever we need to call it, isn’t just about events, it’s about being in the moment…and moments happen every day, not just during the Super Bowl, Oscars or Grammy’s.

I tend to think this is less about real time marketing and more about right time marketing. Real time marketing, as currently conceived, seems almost forced. It’s being fast for the sake of being fast. Right time marketing is more about making sure the right message, is delivered at the right time to the right audience. This isn’t easy. It takes work. It takes effort. It’s a process. It’s a marathon.

It definitely requires some new wiring internally. That re-wiring takes time. But, eventually the muscle memory gets there and it simply becomes the way you create amazing experiences.

As I turn the lens inward, we’ve evolved in the last year. I see progress every day. We, like many brands, definitely stepped up our game following the Super Bowl. For example, this effort by our Campbell Kitchen team during the Grammy’s sticks out as nailing the right moment with the right creative at the right time:

There’s still work to be done. We’re not 100% bright. No one is. That’s the fun.

There’s a certain level of “geek” in all of us. It’s part of what gets us excited when we see a great ad. One of the most challenging things is balancing the inner-geek with what’s right for the business. The inner-geek wants to do the things that are interesting, cool, innovative and headline grabbing. But, I have a responsibility to my team, the great brands I work on and the company who trusted me in this position. The easiest way to temper that inner-geek is to remind myself it’s about driving a brand’s success, not my own personal success.

5 Things I Think About Digital In 2013

Crystal Ball

Before we turn the crystal ball on and look toward 2013, let’s see how I did in predicting what would happen in 2012. After all, if you’re going to go on record about something, you should be held accountable for your words.

  1. “We’re going to see a great deal more consolidation in the social services and software space a la Radian6 and Salesforce. This will lead to fewer options, less innovation, but greater adoption by corporate organizations.” Nailed this. From the acquisitions of Buddy Media (SalesForce), Vitrue (Oracle) and Wildfire (Google) to the partnerships between SymphonyIRI and Visible Technologies, the social media software world get very small.
  2. “The 3 social platforms I’m doubling down on are Get Glue, Pinterest and Google+. They have the right intersection of features, natural consumer behavior, and simplicity to generate scale and enterprise adoption.” Depending on how you look at it, I was right on 1 or 2 of these. Pinterest became a huge player. No one would question that. The world remains divided on Google+, but I’m taking it as correct prediction, given the linking Google is doing between Google+ and search. Get Glue was a bit of a swing and a miss, though the recent merger between them and Viggle, shows why I was betting hard on social TV. The right prediction would have been Nielsen’s partnership with Twitter.
  3. “Conversely, 3 platforms that have gotten a lot of attention, but I’m not bullish on for the enterprise are tumblr, Path (though personally, I love it) and Oink.  They’re all too niche or lack many of the necessary features needed by the enterprise to justify interest, dollars and adoption.” Nailed this. Oink disbanded. Path hasn’t grown. Tumblr, is still not widely adopted, if for not other reason than they don’t seem interested in working with clients to shape the platform for the enterprise.
  4. “More and more organizations will hire “heads” or “leaders” of social to help them take advantage of the space. This will be good for the industry. These heads will hopefully bring balance by eliminating hype and keeping people who thrive on hype, honest.  Additionally, I’ve seen other prognosticators indicating an end of the “Social Media Strategist” role and I couldn’t disagree more.  While, that role may eventually change, morph, and probably fold into the “Marketing” or “Digital/Interactive” role, make no mistake companies like buckets and definitions. Social still being new, will lend itself to being put into manageable buckets by organizations. Those manageable buckets require titles and organizational structures that clearly define boundaries.” Nailed this 100%. Everyone is hiring or has hired heads of social, even if companies have no idea what to do with their new hires.
  5. “Facebook is going to see serious backlash from marketers. They will no longer be able to simply rely on the fact that they are the biggest social network out there. The lack of data transparency, real analytics and their constantly changing platform that’s skewed toward making your purchase ads to create visibility, will lead marketers to consider, “what is my Facebook exit strategy?”” Total homerun on this. It wasn’t just marketers though. When Facebook went public they street even offered some backlash.
  6. “We’re going to see a large number of companies launch in the social insights space. Our problem isn’t having enough data. If anything we have too much data.  What we lack are insights from the data.  Companies like Crimson Hexagon are in a great position to take advantage of this trend.” Nailed it, though I wish I had used the word “big data” since, that’s basically what these companies are claiming to solve for.
  7. “There will be an unfortunate amount of companies trying to socialize everything. This will lead to poor user experiences, bad marketing and jump the shark moments like GM/Chevy crowd sourcing their Super Bowl spot.” Yep, predicted very accurately. From Wal-Marts Black Friday partnership with Facebook to McDonald’s using Hashtags in commercials, we have seen the socialization of just about all areas of marketing communications.
  8. “There will be a backlash similar to what we observed in 2001, where companies will no longer accept half-baked and poorly thought out strategies.  If you will, we’ll see serious curbing of of social ideas for social sake…or to check a box. There will be great rigor being applied to the evaluation of ideas.  Those companies speaking in a language of likes, followers and impressions are destined to earn raised eyebrows and clenched pocketbooks.” Tough to judge this one. There isn’t an official scorecard/evaluation of this prediction, but given the number of agencies like Victor and Spoils that couldn’t make it as standalone buzzword throwers, and were either acquired (like V&S) or simply folded up shop, I feel good about this prediction and I’m calling it a correct prediction.
  9. “The social media “old boys club” will finally see real cracks. It will no longer be acceptable for social media thought leaders to simply pat one another on the back. As competition increases in this space, it will become counter productive to not call BS and hold others accountable for what they say, think and write.” We saw this one come out in full fashion, especially as companies hired heads of social and digital, who were very seasoned. There were more questions about social media “gurus” than there were compliments. What did this lead to? Well, MANY, of these folks who were part of the old boys club, ended up joining larger companies. Speculation would be they plateaued and/or realized they were not going to be successful on their own.
  10. “We will see a major class action lawsuit or congressional inquiry into the privacy, or rather, the lack their of of social networks. Facebook will draw the lion’s share of attention, but companies like foursquare, Google, twitter and others will also come under fire.  People…the customers…the members will take back their privacy.” Happened. Happened. Happened again. The most recent version of this was the lawsuit brought upon Instagram after Instagram chained their TOS.

Last year, I predicted 10 things I thought would happen in Social Media. Given my success rate was 90%+, I’m not pushing my luck in looking toward 2013, so I’m going with 5 predictions. Here’s the 5 things I think I think about digital in 2013:

  1. We’re going to see less emphasis on hiring heads of social and digital and more emphasis on hiring heads of analytics and insights. Now, let me clarify this one. Many companies have a Chief Information Officer or a SVP of Insights. Few companies have a head/lead who is focused on taking structured and unstructured data and turning it into meaningful insights. We’ve heard the word “Data Scientist” thrown around in the last year. We’ve also heard “big data.” These two phrases are generally linked. Unfortunately, usually the role of understanding the data is ignored, outsourced or left to software. Companies who really want to know if what they’re doing is working and who want to invest smarter, will start looking for their own Jonah Hill character from the story Moneyball. Get ready to see lots of active recruiting for Chief/Lead/Principle Data Scientist.
  2. We will see a run of acquisitions by older/established organizations on startups or young organizations. What do I mean? We’re going to see something like Nielsen buying Viggle/Get Glue or Wal-Mart pulling another Kosmix purchase. You’ll see this also in the product space. For example, I think you’ll see someone like Gillette purchase Dollar Shave Club or Pepsi purchase Soda Stream or USA Today purchase Pulse.
  3. There will be too many companies trying to solve the “social TV” question. They will all offer different metrics. The lack of standardization will cause a big problem and set us back. At the end of 2013 or the start of 2014 we’ll see one clear winner.
  4. Twitter will file for IPO. Simple as that.
  5. Facebook will become less friend and more frenemy. To soften their transition toward frenemy, they will offer a tiered structure/classification that will essentially become a pay for access/feature model. Lots of words, I know. Here’s a good example of what I think might happen. Facebook will offer a premium Page Analytics platform that’s only available to brands/companies that have pages with X number of “Likes” or who pay Y dollars a month. In the case of needing X Likes, this is in essence pay for access, because many brands will need to launch Like acquisition campaigns to get the requisite number of Likes needed. You may see something like a fee for API calls to for Facebook Connect or paying X dollars a month will net you premium account management support.

While not a prediction, something I would like to see happen is Apple buy Sprint, create their own cellular network, stop offering iPhones on Verizon and AT&T and then really take it to Samsung. It’s doubtful, but it would be awesome to see happen. If 2012 was a predictor of my own prognostication, I’ll nail at least 4 out of 5 of these predictions. We’ll see how I did, come next December.

The Engagement Problem

So, I’m not sure if you heard…not like you could miss it, but 2 things happened in the last 7 days:

1. GM announced it was no longer going to advertise on Facebook. They aren’t pulling out of Facebook. They will still spend nearly $30M with agencies and partners to create compelling content and experiences for Facebook. But, the $10M a year they spend on paid advertising is no more.

2. Facebook’s IPO finally launched on NASDAQ, but didn’t impress on the opening day and has dropped more than 11% since. I’m not a day trader, night trader or afternoon trader. I can’t pretend to speak about fair IPO pricing, Wall Street Expectations or market caps. But, I can say that I think Facebook’s lagging performance is about more than the over mentioned inability to understand mobile.

Here’s the thing, as Rishad famously once stated, the future cannot be held by the containers of the past. There’s so much truth in that statement. You can’t treat today’s consumer like the consumer from 5 year’s ago, let alone, 20 years ago. You can’t keep trying to make social media your FSI or treating it like radio, print or TV. Heck, you can’t even treat it like digital marketing from 10 years ago. I think the team at Ford really nailed it, when in response to GM’s announcement, they tweeted:

They are 100% correct. Their sentiment isn’t just about Facebook though…it’s about all marketing today. We want great content as consumers. That content manifests itself in commercials (have you seen the Google Chrome ads?), videos (you know, like the Coke Happiness Machine ones), tweet, pins, status updates, print ads (ever watch someone flip through Vogue or Real Simple) and so much more.

The wise marketer today…not just the digital marketer…the wise MARKETER…asks themselves, how can I create content that people can’t wait to consume and then share. And that to me, is engagement at a high-level. You can certainly measure engagement. We do at Campbell Soup and we did at Walgreens. You can create a formula for it and you should. But, you can’t just look at the 1s and 0s. You need to balance the algebra with the conceptual stuff. It’s art and science; not one or the other.

Up until today, I had no idea who Jonathan Salem Baskin was. But, after reading his GREAT article on AdAge titled, “There’s a Message to Marketers in Facebook’s IPO Slide” and more importantly, subtitled, We Must Rethink the Value to Brands of Engagement in Social Media; he’s on my list of people to connect with in real life. The entire article is great and I encourage you to read it. The one salient key nugget that’s so eloquently written and spot on was this:

Facebook’s sole function is engagement. It connects people with one another. Its $3 billion in revenue and $1 billion profit come from advertisers who believe that there must be ways for brands to profit from that engagement. They don’t know how to do it yet. The two hypotheses they’re testing are putting ads around it, and trying to actually host some of it via branded pages interspersed with people pages. There’s no evidence that either yields much beyond nice-to-have benefit, and some experimenters (most recently GM) have given up trying, for now. Again, since Facebook makes money either way, I’d take a small piece of such failure and consider my life’s work a success.

Like Rishad says, the future, or in this case, the PRESENT cannot be held by the containers of the past. If you treat TV like an FSI you won’t be happy with the results. And if you treat Facebook like direct mail, you’re really going to be disappointed. Engagement is a problem, because it’s unpredictable and we have a tough time, as marketers, being comfortable with things that aren’t predictable. We love the FSI, because we know with X circulation and offer of Y, we’ll see Z performance. We love things like TV, because even though TV has dramatically changed in the last 5, 10, 20 and 30 years, our marketing mix models that are based on historical data give us a way to predict success.

Ultimately, it’s our inability to be comfortable with ambiguity makes it so tough for us to accept that engagement is important. Remember this, you can’t have a sale without engagement. Even a direct response transaction…requires engagement. Don’t get mad at Facebook for selling engagement. Get mad at yourself for not putting some rigor around engagement…for not adding some science to the art and for having the wrong expectations for what Facebook can do for your business.

The Benefits Of Unplugging

True story; in 2003 on my 10 day honeymoon to St. Thomas I took 1, 1-hour conference call. I never lived that down. Even though it was 1 call, the impact and ramifications were significant.

Following that trip, it was agreed that we would only travel to locations that lacked cell phone reception. Translation: all travel was international. London, Paris, Rome, Mexico, etc. became “acceptable” destinations.

Of course, as technology advanced it became harder to avoid ways to stay connected. In London, I found an Apple Store to check work email. In Rome, it was a cyber cafe. In Paris it was a work paid for international SIM card. Crazy. Believe me, I know.

There’s not even a cost/price barrier anymore. Technology and the ease to stay connected, make it tough to unplug. Forget travel, just think about the last time you went out to dinner. How long did that phone stay in your pocket?

Of late, I’ve been trying to unplug. As I wrote earlier, it’s tough to change habits. But, you can change habits by making small adjustments. For example, here’s 4 things I’m doing to unplug more often:

1. When I go out to dinner, I turn my phone off, leave it at home or put in my coat pocket.

2. When I come home from work, the phone gets plugged in. Not just plugged in, plugged in, in another room. It’s out of sight and out of mind.

3. On weekends, when I’m with the kids, the phone is on lockdown. I rarely take it out. Not unlike with dinner, I will often leave the phone home if I’m out with them.

4. I’ve changed how I’m using social apps like foursquare. For example, I rarely check in all the time at every place I visit. These days I’m checking in with an intent or using foursquare to help me learn about places, not broadcast that I’m there.

Since I’ve implemented these changes a few weeks back I’ve been happier. It took a few days to adjust. Like a smoker who gives it up cold turkey, there was a period of adjustment. But, let me tell you it’s been worth it!

foursquare Understands Social For The Enterprise

There’s no shortage of companies to partner with in the social space.  It gets even more complex in the social-local game.  Even if you ignore all the new start-ups, you still have a number of serious players to consider working with: Gowalla, GetGlue, Loopt, Google Places, Facebook Places, scvngr, Where, Bright Kite and so many more. For a marketer this can be daunting.  The reality is, you can’t bet across all of these platforms.  You really do need to pick your spots.  Scale is important, but are other dimensions like is your audience using the platform, or do their “tools” support your business goals/objectives.  Bet wrong and it’s a big miss.  In large organizations the wrong bet can stunt your ability to continue experimenting and can siphon off the financial support needed to make social work.

At Walgreens, I continue to be impressed with how quickly foursquare innovates. From standard features sets, like the merchant api, to custom solutions specific to our needs (more on this in the near future), they set a high bar for the competition. As we focus on bringing social media down to the individual store level, the new merchant tools offer us unprecedented control over the types of offers we put in market to support our 7,700+ store footprint. The ability to customize around the standard api is what makes the foursquare announcement so intriguing. It provides us nearly limitless possibilities. For example, we could integrate check-ins into our award winning iPhone app that are specific to how we and our customers do business.

With foursquare’s new merchant tools we won’t be tied to a standard set of features designed to solve for the least common denominator. This approach is something that is germane to the way social media should work, but is at odds with how foursquare’s competitors are approaching the space.  The competitive set usually offers a standard tool-set (at best) for all companies to leverage.  The ability to customize for a specific need, campaign or organization just isn’t there.

Social is not a 1 size fits all proposition. It’s refreshing to see a company like foursquare offering companies like Walgreens the ability to customize the foursquare experience for our customers. As the largest retailer (based on followers) on foursquare, the new merchant tools will help us provide a return on amazing for our customers and a return on investment for our stores.

The die is cast, as Julius Caesar would say, and other social location platforms need to up their game to evolve into partners that understand the needs of the enterprise.

3 Simple Phrases For Social Success

Yesterday I had the privilege of sitting on Yahoo!’s Social Symposium panel. I was joined by a great mix of people representing Corona, Gilt Group, Tech.li and Yahoo! Lots of knowledge and insights were shared. The folks at Yahoo! did a great job of organizing the event and keeping the discussion lively. I’m sure I spoke more than I should have. It’s a habit :)

Amidst all the great conversation topics we discussed the one I keep coming back to is what are you doing to create success in social.  Before I dig into that, let me say the organizational support, a healthy budget and a strong brand/product really do make a big difference.  Without them, even the best idea, the best strategy, the best initiative will often #fail.  When we think about how we succeed in social at Walgreens, it really comes down to 3 Simple Phrases:

1. How can we help?  That’s the basis for everything we do.  We ask ourselves how can we help?  This goes beyond customer service.  It’s about knowing the unmet needs.  What services, products, tools, platforms, etc. can we bring to market that will make our customers’ lives better, simpler, easier, etc.

2. Thank you! It’s a simple 2 word phrase, but it always makes people smile.  It’s often unexpected from companies.  It’s a nice surprise and delight when a company thanks an individual for feedback (even when it’s negative), an idea, retweet, a link to some of our content, a check-in, etc.

3. I’m sorry.  To err is human.  We make mistakes.  Sometimes the mistakes are things we can’t control, but the customer doesn’t understand that.  They only understand that in their eyes we have failed them.  Being able to make apologize for the mistakes we make, regardless of our control over those mistakes, goes a long way.  The other night Walgreens.com experiences a site outage.  We let our customers know what was going on via Facebook.  The overwhelming majority thanked us for being proactive.  There were a few who used our post as an opportunity to continue voicing their displeasure.  Ironically, our fans who were thankful of being kept in the loop defended us against the dissenters.  It’s always nice to see our passionate fans support us against our detractors.  But, that can only happen when you’re willing to admit your mistakes and take ownership for them.

There’s platforms, there’s networks, there’s tools, there’s all these options out there that help us lose focus.  I find that remembering the 3 phrases above keeps us on mission.

Can You Pay People To Change?

Can you pay people to change?  Can you purchase compliance?  Is social success predicated on company culture?  Do people really want to be social?  Are the social “gurus” (laughable) right in how the lofty and esoterica language they use to describe social?  All of these questions and more are up for grabs with Google’s decision to tie employee bonuses to the succes of failure of their forays into the social space.

Last week, Larry Page, Google’s CEO sent out a company wide memo that outlined the importance of social, the role employees must play in driving social success and how their compensation will be tied to Google’s growth in social.  If you will, Google is trying to buy employee participation, adoption, interest and promotion of social.

Ballsy, for sure.  It certainly sends a signal that Google has flopped thus far in social and doesn’t want it to happen again.  I’m not exaggerating when I say failure.  Take for example the following: Knoll wasn’t a hit.  Orkut fell on deaf ears.  Jaiku was just bad.  Wave was a failure.  Blogger is nice, but is no WordPress.  Buzz didn’t take off.

Over and over Google has flopped in the social space for one reason or another.  Will this brave approach by Larry Page be the lightening rod that unifies the organization or will it cause irreparable harm because people will be faking their participation?

Time will tell.  But, one thing is for sure, this is the ultimate social experiment.

My Fascination With Groupon

I’m fascinated with Groupon.  I finally signed up for it yesterday.  I tried to resist.  I tried to fight it.  I listened to my friends talk about the horror stories of how Groupon buries their inbox with offer after offer.  I’ve seen the funny tweets about how Groupon is just filled with spa offer after spa offer after spa offer.
All that said, I finally broke down and signed up.  Why?  Because I am just fascinated with Groupon.  They’ve hit on a model, where I am finally excited about opening an email, because I never know what I’m going to find in there.  It’s the ultimate surprise and delight model.  After signing up, I checked out all of their offers, downloaded the app and yes, I opened up a few emails.
I may never buy anything from Groupon, but they have me hooked and that’s why I’m fascinated.

The Rise Of Mocial

At the last iMedia Summit, the speakers and attendees were all a buzz with the term “mocial.”  Which of course is the combination of mobile and social.  Industry veterans, like myself, rolled our eyes.  It’s not the concept we disliked it’s the creation of yet another marketing buzzword.

Buzzword silliness aside, you have to love and respect the influence and impact mobile usage has on social behavior.  I came across this great infographic earlier today that really helps crystalize why mobile has finally ready to rule.

We All Want To Be Found

One of the the reasons I loathe AdAge is how slow they are.  If you’re reading something in AdAge there’s a good chance you’re about 3 months behind.  A lot of my colleagues and clients are all a flutter about this article titled, Forget Foursquare: Why Location Marketing Is New Point Of Sale.  Well thank your AdAge for insight that I covered last April 2009 in a post titled It’s Not Who You Are – It’s Where You Are. This is what I wrote back then:

Lately, it seems people are catching religion and evolving beyond pure demographics. My feeling is that we’re just about ready to jump on the “where are consumers” band wagon. Tools like Loopt and BrightKite cater specifically this concept. They allow users to see where are other users are. The new version of AOL Instant Messenger and Tweetie apps for the iPhone both offer the ability to see where other users of that app are. The applications and tools are nice, but it’s the sophistication of mobile devices and their adoption by consumers that are enabling this shift to happen. Hell, the iPhone has built in GPS so that you always know exactly where you are.

I’m a big time fourSquare fan.  I think they’ve nailed the right combination of sharing, gaming, context, simplicity, and user experience.  I’ve played with Gowalla, Loopt, Loopt Mix, BrightKite, Google Latitude and a whole host of other location based social platforms.  Part of the reason for the success of these platforms is the ability to leverage them on-the-go.  Today, on-the-go means mobile it doesn’t mean a laptop.  The computing power in devices like the Nexus One make mobile a tremendously capable platform and marketing channel.  The one aspect of the AdAge article I do agree with is that we shouldn’t just be focusing on specific networks, platforms, or apps.  The key is to have a comprehensive local strategy.  That local strategy might lead you to fourSquare, but it also might push you to Yelp! or something basic like geo-focused SEM.

At the intersection of mobile and social is the ability to broadcast our lives directly from our pocket. Those tweets, check-ins, and status updates create a rich stream of content for marketers to leverage.  Many believe that the “need” to keep our friends and the community at large in the loop is an indication of our vanity. Sure, for some, status updating is all about status. But, I believe for the majority of us we’re not looking to win a popularity contest, we’re simply looking to be found.

Let’s face it, most of us aren’t cool. We desire connection. We desire to know we matter. Being found validates our existence. As the old saying goes, to the world you are someone, but to someone you are the world. When we’re found we transform from just someone to someone’s world.

Of course this only happens if you’re listening.

About
Global Head of Digital Marketing & Social Media at Campbell Soup Co. Running a marathon at a sprinter's pace. Love ironing and my

kids, but not necessarily in that order. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »