Tag Archive: Social Networking

We’re All Accountable For The State Of Social Media

I heart Jeremiah Owyang. Have never met him in person. Would love to though. I think he works really hard at his craft. He understands the concept of riding waves. He left Forrester at the right point. He invested in social at the right point. He’s smart. He’s one of my favorite people to follow and I’ve learned a lot from him.

Recently, he wrote a great post that basically speaks to the CONSTANT reinvention by companies grappling with how to hold on the ever changing landscape of the Social Media space. Specifically, he was talking about pure play social media organizations getting into the media planning and buying space.

I’ve long said we need a social media sheriff. We need someone with the Klout (pun intended) to really call a spade a spade and not be fearful of bruising some egos.  As Philip Seymour Hoffman said in Say Anything:

My advice to you. I know you think those guys are your friends. You want to be a true friend to them? Be honest and unmerciful.

Frankly, we need more of that in this space.  We need an Angie’s List and a “please, run the other way, and never work this company/person” list.  Of course, love creating the former and sprint away from the latter.  Jeremiah and most analysts will focus on the Angie’s List. You’ll rarely, if ever, see an analysis where an analyst advises avoiding a company.

In the last 15 years in this business I’ve seen a lot while traversing the client and agency side of the business. I’ve sold and been sold. I’ve built social media offerings out of scratch for 2 agencies and listened nearly 1,000 different pitches from companies talking about their approach or solve for social. That’s not an exaggerated figure. I take all calls all the time. This space changes all the time and I never want to miss a potential opportunity.

In response to Jeremiah’s post, I left a comment on his site, but I think it needs a larger platform. It’s actually something that’s been on my mind for a few years now and in a stream of consciousness while waiting for a plane it all finally manifested into words.

With that said, here’s what I think about the state of social media.

We have a big problem. Not a small problem. It was a small problem 4 years ago. Not a medium size problem. It was a medium size problem 2 years. Today, we have a titanic sized problem in the industry that stems from a general lack of accountability. In Groupon’s recent 10K filing they stated something very profound:

We expect competition in e-commerce to continue to increase because THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS TO ENTRY.

It’s those lack of barriers that has allowed so many startups to enter the social media playing field. This isn’t just in the social software arena, where there seems to be a new Buddy Media or Hootsuite copycat. No, we’re also seeing large companies create social media spin off companies, departments or “revenue centers.” We’re seeing social media boutiques pop up all the time.  As a litany of companies enter the space, it becomes ever more challenging to understand which of these offerings are legitimate, credible and which are selling vaporware.

So, yeah, we have a problem.

But, make no mistake, we created this problem. As agencies we rushed to create social media/business offerings. As an industry we allowed consultants with no experience, but several books to call themselves experts and earn the ear of clients. As social media boutiques we offered buzz word after buzz word but nary a person who’d actually been in the trenches. As clients we turned to all of these companies and said fix it; we washed our hands of the problem by outsourcing it. But who did we outsource it to?

The reason there’s a lack of case studies has everything to do with the fact we still live in a world with risk averse clients, an impatient C-suite, shareholders demanding instant return and of course companies (social media agencies, holding companies, etc.) offering quick solutions. We allow Facebook to keep changing the system and offering almost zero data transparency. We bellied up to the table and kept spending without any concept of what we were buying.

Oh, we most definitely created this problem. And, what do we do in this post and the comments? We offer, at best, half-measured responses that skirt around the issue. We have allowed social media to become SEO industry; a collection of pseudo experts all promising a solution without the talent to do deliver.

Frankly, it’s depressing. I hope for better. But, until we actually are willing to be honest and take a stand against the bullshit being passed off as social media experts, companies and strategy; you aren’t allowed to complain. No, you can’t complain when you lose a piece of business to the smoke and mirrors boutique that has a book, fancy slides and manufactured metrics. We need better accountability. We need the analysts to do their job, step up and call bullshit, bullshit.

But, I get it. Right now, there is zero incentive to be brutally honest. The analysts would lose their connections. The agencies who took a stand would lose short term revenue. The clients would have to admit ignorance. And, well, all of us, with “personal brands” would of course lose all the social media juice that comes from the situation we created. We deserve better. This industry deserves better. Look yourself in the mirror and ask yourself, if you’re ready to stop perpetuating this situation. I bet you, the answer is no. That’s ok, just like SEO rose above a sewer like environment, so will social. When it does, history will remember your part and reward you accordingly.

What I Learned In 2010

It’s been a hell of a year. Before the start of the New Year I often take stock of the current year. I think it’s important to reflect on what you’ve learned, otherwise you’ll simply make the same mistakes. 2010 was an interesting year. I think the overall theme was humbled. When I add up everything I experienced, everything I’ve learned, it all rolls up to that magic word. I could wax on and on about the definition of humbled and how it applies to the last 12 months, but I’ll spare you the philosophy and get right to everything I’ve learned.

  1. Pork bellies are to die for
  2. Social media is creating mobs reminiscent of ancient Rome
  3. Never under-estimate the impact, power and influence Facebook has on your own relationships
  4. I can live without “stuff” – I think we accumulate too much stuff unnecessarily, it’s amazing how little you can get by on
  5. I love my car, it loves me and it’s just that simple
  6. People who have dogs are a little bit crazy; nod your head, accept it and move on – we’re all a little crazy
  7. White plates aren’t boring, they’re pretty cool
  8. The world and people are fickle. One minute your up, the next minute your down.
  9. As Sinatra said, “some people get their kicks stomping on a dream”
  10. Sweet tea is great; I sometimes wish I lived in the south so I can have it every day
  11. Business class isn’t worth paying for
  12. Music is more important to me than I ever thought it was or it could be
  13. If it doesn’t make dollars, it doesn’t make sense
  14. Don’t sweat the small stuff; it ain’t worth it
  15. Accept that flights will be delayed and/or canceled; it happens
  16. When you see the red flags, stop and reconsider
  17. Abide by Gladwell’s “Blink” concept
  18. Blood is thicker than water; never under-estimate the influence parents have
  19. Quality over quantity
  20. There’s red wine out there I can enjoy
  21. As the Godfather said, “keep your friends close and your enemies closer
  22. Try as I might, I still have no love for fish
  23. Kids can make you feel old and young at the same time
  24. Take chances, take risks and embrace failure
  25. I still believe in the idea of the grand gesture, despite seeing it backfire 3 times this year
  26. You can’t expect people to live up to the expectations you place upon yourself; we’re all different
  27. I’m addicted to Hot Chocolate – the best is from Peet’s Coffee
  28. Forever isn’t forever, it for as long as you make it
  29. You can leverage customer service as great marketing; see Southwest
  30. 10 year old+ Crystal Pepsi is not tasty at all
  31. Apparently, I notice people’s teeth first; it’s made me more aware of my own teeth
  32. In the first 5 minutes people will tell you their 3 most important “things”
  33. Virtual connections are great, but real ones are better
  34. I’m not a fan of makeup on women – just not, sorry
  35. My feet have gotten bigger or shoes sizes are skewing smaller – either way, I gained a half size
  36. Live concerts are amazing; there is no comparison
  37. My ex-wife is an amazing mother and friend.  We should all be so lucky to have such great divorces.  Every time I see my kids I see the impact she makes on them every day.
  38. “Change The Game” is an over used marketing goal/strategy and/or tagline
  39. CraigsList amazes me – so easy to use, so effective
  40. You’re not as important as you think you are; people move on really quick and you’re easily forgotten
  41. Cell phones are cheaply made – I’ve broken two this year, one by dropping and one from some water
  42. Being stubborn doesn’t help anyone, least of all, yourself
  43. Make the little things, the big things
  44. You can never have enough cabinet space in your kitchen
  45. eMail, texting, chatting and other forms of digital communication are crippling us – make more time for face time
  46. What’s in the box matters…
  47. I’m a great dad, but I can still be better
  48. You’ll meet new and amazing people when you least expect it
  49. It takes two; you can only control your own destiny to a point
  50. I was wrong about the iPad. It’s quickly becoming the killer device.
  51. I was right about Android; the walled garden Apple offers won’t be able to compete
  52. It’s not about who you are or where you are; it’s about who you’re with
  53. I don’t know as much as I thought I did

So there it is. 2010 was a year of ups and downs, highs and lows and at times was like a roller coaster. I’m looking forward to applying everything I learned in 2010 to 2011. I have a feeling 2011 is going to be pretty kick ass.

SETI@home – The First Real Global Social Network

We’re still all a flutter with the concept of “social networks.”  Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr generally get the most attention.  They’re well known and are the household names that even your mom knows.  Last night I watched an episode of Numb3rs that referenced the famous Seti@Home project.  For those that don’t remember SETI is an acronym for the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence.  It’s a volunteer based social computing project that launched in May 1999.

There are all these conversations taking place in space.  Some are simply noise, but some could be evidence of life beyond this planet.  Someone needs to make sense of the noise.  It takes an inordinate amount of time and effort to sift through and make sense of the information.  For years special large super computers were used to analyze very narrow band radio frequency from outer space. Relying on just the limited number of super computers was a slow time consuming approach.  The Seti@home project was designed to eliminate that problem.

By  downloading the Seti@home software any computer anywhere in the world could help make sense of the noise coming from space.  In essence the Seti@home project combines the power of all the computers participating in the program to decode the data from space faster.  The more people who download and participate, the faster we’ll discover life beyond Earth.  Talk about joining something for a higher order of reason. 

I remember when Seti came on the scene.  I was working at Fallon and learned about it from a colleague.  He explained to me that every person who signed up for the program was helping to find Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence.  He demoed the software for me and I was hooked.  I downloaded the software and started trying to convince all my friends and family to do the same.

To date the Seti@home project has over 5 million members in more than 200 countries.  This is amazing considering the original goal for the program was between 50,000 and 100,000 members.  In total this community has contributed over 19 billion hours of computer processing time.  Unfortunately, the project hasn’t uncovered any Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence, but it has identified several candidate targets (sky positions).  In 2004, the astronomer Seth Shostak indicated a conclusive signal from Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence would happen some time between 2020 and 2025.  That’s an amazing amount of progress for a program that’s only 10 years old.

Brining this back to social networking, the buzz topic du jour.  The Seti initiative has all the underpinnings of what a defines a great social network:

  1. Limited barriers to join
  2. Gender and age agnostic
  3. A real reason for joining – a greater good
  4. Sense of being and purpose
  5. Like-minded individuals
  6. Connected to a common goal
  7. Constant feedback
  8. Measurable results
  9. Authenticity…
  10. …and yes even Transparency
  11. The ability to opt out easily

This isn’t to say that Seti@home is perfect. In truth, it’s a social network that’s showing its age. In today’s new and ever evolving landscape where we’re all hyper-connected to the internet it seems like they’ve passed on serious opportunity. For example, how hard would it be to have an iPhone app that leverages the 3G network to compute the information a Facebook/iGoogle widget that basically is the software? Given all the people we’re connected with and the ease/efficiency to grow networks today, why haven’t they invested in leveraging those connections?

As the web evolved the program remained virtually stagnant…trapped in 1999. If ever there were an initiative that could really harness the power of today’s social web this is it. Seti I want to help. Let’s talk.

Guest Post – Marketing Is Supposed To Be About Relationships

I’m out on vacation this week. The keys to TheKmiecs.com have been turned over to a few, select, awesome guest writers. The following has not been edited by me and is the work and effort of the original author. I appreciate the time and thinking that went into this post and hope you will too. Enjoy!

Marketing is supposed to be all about relationships. Based on this belief, it stands to reason that marketers would want to use media that has as its distinguishing feature being part of the connective tissue that holds people together. Thus the enthusiasm for social media and its ilk.

Lots of different vehicles these days are put under the heading of “social media.” Pretty much anything that can facilitate two-way communications between two or more people could be classified as “social media.” Depending on whom you ask email would technically fall into the category of social media. Depending on who else you might ask, so would the telephone or CB radio.

But the kinds of things that have the interests peaked of those who work at the bleeding edge of marketing are tools and technologies that atomizes our expressions, globalizes their reach, and localizes their targetability all at the same time.

We’ve got Twitter to micro-blog every crumb that falls from the buttered toast of our lives. We’ve got Facebook to broadcast the expression of those crumbs to the Etherverse via TwitterSync. And soon to follow will be marketers using the likes of Loopt or Google Latitude to find us where we are when brushing those crumbs from the fronts of our shirts and send us location-based messages on where to buy the bread, where to buy the butter, where to buy the knife with which to spread that butter, and perhaps where to buy the cleaning agents that can clean the shirts from which we are brushing the aforementioned crumbs.

Micro Blogging
Twitter is awfully interesting. I twitter sometimes not at all and sometimes several times a day. Most of the time, posts I read are not here or there in terms of their relevance to my life. They rarely offer a depth of insight on a given subject. But they are sometimes interesting, funny or just downright cute (one fellow I follow posts only things his kids say). Every once in a while there is a link to an article or a video or some other bit of bytes that lead me to that depth and insight Twitter, due to its character constraints, lacks.

Will Twitter hurt how we think and, thus, act, which in turn will change how we market to one another? Maybe. The structure of our language –even our syntax – dictates how we think, it forms the way we conceptualize; the means by which we articulate the world and what is in it informs what it is we think is in the world.

My concern is that the diminishment of formal structure – be it due to a lack of familiarity, willful rejection of it because of some belief that it is authoritarian or elitist, or a restriction of the characters we can write with — will lead to structure’s eradication for the sake of utility. Utility only and always without at least knowing what formal structure needs to be violated in order to achieve it leads to homogenizing, standardizing and monotonizing.

In an environment where infosnacking and reflex replaces deliberation and practiced experience, how we define intelligence and reason will become unrecognizable.

How can something like this be tamed for marketing?

Facebook, MySpace, et al
Marketers are drawn to social networks as an adverting vehicle for the same reasons they are drawn to any media vehicle: the size of its audiences and the popularity it enjoys. That does not, however, always translate into viability as a means for delivering advertising. Toilet paper, after all, is also rather popular. Certainly everyone I know uses it. But I have yet to see ads on it. This is not to equate delivery systems, but rather to demonstrate that widespread use is not a sufficient condition for carrying an ad message. There are reasons why social networking properties should be approached with care:

  • Social networking is just a communication format, not a media vehicle; per se. Social networking is the first decade of the 21st century’s email. Aside from being a domain, do any of the free online email providers, even Gmail, really have a brand? Do any of them offer any specific value to marketers looking to advertising that can’t be had anywhere else? Not really. What they offer is scale (the audiences are huge) and some targetability. Certainly the kind of information available about users will lend itself to greater levels of targetability, but as we’ve already seen, the community is going to police itself against that targetability going too far.
  • The relationship aura an advertiser might hope to benefit from doesn’t always really exist there. It’s a place where people allow others to be connected to them, but they don’t really have relationships there. While expanding the number of “relationships” we have, it degrades their quality for the sake of quantity. Like slicing a peach, with every cut, you lose some juice.
  • Advertisers will have to compete with the brand of ‘Me’ in a social networking environment. Social networking is really a platform for self-branding. People are opening their kimonos to show off their rock-hard abs or their gorgeous breasts or the funny image they shaved in their back hair. It is an opportunity for a kind of narcissism that doesn’t ostensibly put us at physical risk. A Facebook page is like driving down the street with the radio turned up loud and the windows down; it is wearing a concert T-shirt; it is a way of advertising who we want others to think we are.
  • People in marketing and advertising always like to think that the general population likes what we do as much as we do. The general population’s relationship with advertising is at best one of managed hostility, regardless of what one might say about it when the advertising message coming to him or her has been sent by their “BFF” (Best Friend Forever). Will an ensuing deluge of advertising — whether or not it was endorsed by the Lil’ Green Patch friend of a friend — be accepted?

Location Based Services & Targeting
There are as lot of GPS-type applications out there now that, with the growing popularity of smartphones, is experiencing their own surge in popularity. This has the marketing community talking about whether apps like Loopt, Google Latitude, Navteq and others can be used to serve advertising to people based on where they are.

First of all, aside from helicopter parents who might want to know what their kids are doing at every second, are these tools even valuable? Knowing my friends are near is quaint, but, if I’ve already mediated my relationship with them to the point where I’m only communicating with them by posting a note to their Facebook wall, which in turn sends an email to them to tell him or her to go to their Facebook page to read the note I left on their wall, am I REALLY going to make the effort to see them and have a beer, physically, even if they are a few blocks away?

Second, the long-held belief in advertising has been that location somehow makes advertising

a) more meaningful

b) more relevant and thus

c) more effective

But does it? Just because I’m near a McDonald’s doesn’t mean that I’m ready to eat there. Knowing where stores are is valuable, but that’s search addressable more than it is advertising. I think we in advertising and marketing overvalue the tricks of targeting. Most people have a relationship with advertising that is on average one of managed hostility. I don’t know that “adver-stalking” would endear a brand to a potential consumer. I suppose it could operate on an opt-in basis and entice purchase or trial with incentives. But I have my doubts about a marketing application.

What’s the solution to all of the above? Marketers’ least favorite form of advertising due to its lack of forced reach and potential glamour, but it is among the most effective: “Pull” advertising.

It’s what search is, yellow pages used to be, and what widgets are becoming. You approach the opportunity as one where the audience you are trying to reach reaches out to you instead of you reaching out to them, then you’ve got something here.

Jim Meskauskas
VP, Director of Online Media
ICON International
www.twitter.com/mediadarwin

Can Facebook Still Be Cool If Your Mom Is A Member?

I love my mom. She’s great. And, while I love spending time with her during the holidays and occasionally talking on the phone, the concept of hanging out with my mom at a bar just isn’t my idea of fun.

Think about when you were a kid, didn’t you push to have your mom drop you off at the mall instead of hanging out with you and your friends at the mall? When you went to college, wouldn’t you have been mortified if your mom showed up at a kegger or frat party? Again, there are just some places where you and your mom shouldn’t be hanging out.

In many respects we’ve always thought of our parents as one step behind. Music and fashion are great examples. It’s rare for parents and their kids (regardless of age) to sync on clothes and musicians. Do you remember the Hammer Pants phase? I do; sadly, I owned a few pairs. Could you imagine if your mom embraced Hammer Pants and decided to wear them? The minute she put the pants on that style would no longer be “cool” in your eyes. After all, we spent a good portion of our adolescence trying to be different than our parents.

OK, so what happens when your mom and dad join Facebook? Do you really want your parents to write on your wall? Do you want them to see the photos from last night’s drunken escapades? Of course not. I see more and more parents joining Facebook. Some are joining to keep tabs on their kids. Some are joining to reconnect with old friends. If Facebook was a popular night club that you frequented and all of a sudden you saw your mom at the bar drinking a gin and tonic, wouldn’t you shudder just a little bit? Wouldn’t you rethink coming back to the club? Would you wonder if the club had peaked and was no longer trendy?

In a lot of ways this is what’s happening to Facebook. Now that our/your parents are on Facebook does it mean Facebook has peaked? This is a serious question. For a while we had MySpace all to ourselves. Then we had to move to Facebook. I know there are many other players out there, but those are the big two. Perhaps the reason there are so many other social networking sites is because despite how much we talk about wanting to be connected with the world we really just want to hang out with our own click.

Ning, the site that lets you create your own social network, has continued to grow very quickly. Ditto for Twitter. It’s safe to say that Ning and Twitter, despite their growth, are still not household everyday names. If you will, our parents still don’t know what they are. Could it be that people are flocking to Ning, Twitter, Tumblr, FriendFeed, and others because Facebook just isn’t cool anymore? When our parents start finding the cool clubs we hang out at is the club still cool? More importantly, do we want to hang out at the club if our parents are there with us? I don’t have the answers, yet, but I’m willing to ask the questions.

Mom, I love you, but please don’t join Facebook. If you do, I might have to reject your friend request.

About
Global Head of Digital Marketing & Social Media at Campbell Soup Co. Running a marathon at a sprinter's pace. Love ironing and my

kids, but not necessarily in that order. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »