Tag Archive: Forrester

ReThinking Mixing Friends And Business – Part I

This is going to be the first of a three part set of posts on ReThinking Mixing Friends And Business.

If you’ve been reading this blog long enough, you know I have a great appreciation and love for the movie, “Almost Famous.” It’s definitely one of my all-time favorite movies because not only is it entertaining, but it brings to light so many life lessons. One of those life lessons is the intersection of friends with business. Lester Bangs warns William Miller about the dangers of becoming friends of the band. His rationale is that it would hurt his ability to do his job well. His job is to write the truth about what he sees and what he thinks about the band. If you become friends with the band, can you really crucify them?

By the end of the movie, William is at a crossroads. He owes his completed article to Rolling Stone magazine, but is struggling with how to write it because he knows that the truth is harsh and Stillwater (the band) may not recover from such brutal honesty.

While at this crossroads William calls Lester for advice and the following is shared:

Aw, man. You made friends with them! See, friendship is the booze they feed you. They want you to get drunk on feeling like you belong.

That line is followed up with this gem:

My advice to you. I know you think those guys are your friends. You want to be a true friend to them? Be honest and unmerciful.

William, with amazing journalistic integrity unleashes the brutal truth in his article for Rolling Stone. During the fact checking process the band is blown away by what he’s written. It’s harsh, honest, and uncomfortable to say the least. The reason their shell shocked is because as Jeff states:

He was supposed to be our friend.

Talk about a life lesson and a half.

Our industry is filled with chances to be honest, authentic, and genuine. But, too often we pass on those chances. I’ve been overly critical of so-called professional analysts like soon to be former Forrester Social Media analyst Jeremiah Owyang. An analyst is supposed to dig in to a situation and honestly assess it. These analysts, with rare exception never provide the brutal honest truth. They avoid controversy and critique like it was the plague. In short, they don’t do the job they’re being paid to do.

I tend to believe the reason they don’t provide an honest assessment of company, person, or situation is that it’s not to their personal benefit. They need to maintain these friendships and connections for future gain. They need to keep things more friendship focused than business focused. You need only look at the number of people leaving analyst firms to join a company they’ve previously “analyzed” to see what I mean.

The other analogous situation where the role of analyst lacks objectivity due to friendships is with sports commentary.  Have you watched Sports Center lately?  There’s not reporting or analysis taking place, save for Bill Simmons.  It’s clear that traditional journalists like Chris Berman would rather remain chummy with athletes than honestly critique them.  It’s clear that former athletes like Mike Golic would rather stay neutral than provide the unique type of insight and evaluation only a former athlete can bring to the table.  There’s no real critique taking place.  There’s no real analysis.  The depth they’re providing is about as shallow as Paris Hilton.  Yes, we’re talking paper thin.

Does this surprise you?  It shouldn’t.  If you’re an athlete, would you want to grant an interview to a hard hitting reporter or analyst who might make you look bad?  Of course not.  But, to the reporter who provides softballs, you’ll grant access all day long.  The general public isn’t as demanding as I am.  They can’t tell the difference between true reporting and a surface level puff piece.  If your audience can’t tell the difference and your subject matter will shun you if you are overly critical, it becomes a means of self preservation to not be critical, hard hitting, or controversial.

It’s tough to mix business and friendship.  It’s not easy.  It shouldn’t be.  If it were that easy you probably aren’t really friends in the first place.  Parts II and III will be up later this week.  Stay tuned.

5 Things Bugging Me Right Now

I’m limiting this list of things that bug me to only 10.  I could probably create a list that goes upward of 100.

  1. Sites that have content being indexed by Google, but then require you to join or login to view the content.  This is just a horrible user experience.  I search for something.  I see a link with some descriptor copy that appears to be exactly what I want – so I click on it.  Only 1 problem though, instead of seeing the content I was hoping to see, I get a login/register page.  The Wall Street Journal, Consumer Reports, and The New York Times are notorious for this.
  2. Re-touching.  I’ve long said, I think Ansel Adams was a crappy photographer and an amazing darkroom magician.  He didn’t make his magic behind the camera, he made it in the dark room.  With the recent turmoil over the Kelly Clarkson “Self” cover, this issue is back in the news.  As a more than amateur photographer, I have a big problem with people taking photos, Photoshopping the hell out of them and then passing them off as originals.  That’s not very transparent is it?
  3. Companies adding a bunch of social networking icons to the footer or the header is not the answer to creating a social site.  Don’t get me wrong, I think adding those icons is the first step.  Not only does is help with SEO, but it allows you to add richer content without changing your sites infrastructure.  But, right now too many companies think that just adding those icons somehow somehow solves all of their social “media” needs.
  4. Analysts that only focus on providing “positive” commentary and clearly avoiding constructive criticism.  I get the feeling a lot of analysts are struggling with how to be honest about their “friends.”  There’s a great scene in the movie “Almost Famous” where Philip Seymour Hoffman’s character (Lester Bangs) offers some advice to Patrick Fugit’s character (William Miller) about how to write a great column.  The advice is simple, “Be honest and unmerciful.”  I think a great number of analysts, especially the Forrester ones could learn something from that simple line.
  5. We need universal FREE wiFi.  If not free, close to it.  Let’s agree that innovation is a critical component to growth.  Let’s agree that having the right tools helps you innovate faster.  Let’s agree that this country is falling dramatically behind our nations when it comes to innovation.  Let’s also agree that the internet for a variety of reason propels innovation and thinking forward.  If we can agree on all of the above, then how does it make sense that we are charging more and more for a sub-standard infrastructure.  If you think I’m crazy, just check out this article or this information about South Korea’s internet access.  If we want great ideas to come from this country, we need to rethink our approach to propelling those ideas forward.

Thanks for listening.  Had to get that out of my system.

Truth Vs. Honesty

I don’t envy the job of an analyst or reviewer. People send you their hopes and dreams, often in the form of a “product,” and your job is to be honest. It’s a relatively small world we live in. It’s not uncommon for the product’s owner/manufactuer to be a friend or colleague of the reviewer. This makes the situation even tougher. But, this personal relationship shouldn’t change the job of the reviewer or analyst. Their job is to tell a truthful story.

Here’s the thing about truth and honesty. The seem similar, but they mean 2 very different things.

Here’s an example:

A wife confronts her husband and asks “are you cheating on me with Lisa?” The husband replies truthfully, “no.” Had he replied honestly, he would have said, “no, but I am with Mary.”

People can tell the truth and be very dishonest at the same time. Lately, I’ve been noticing that reviewers, columnists, analysts, and the like are becoming more and more dishonest. It’s very concerning. We rely on these people to add clarity and separate fact from fiction. But, if they’re more focused on truth sans the honesty their work is compromised. I don’t want to get into names here, but suffice it to say, the people we’re talking about are reputable well known industry names.

Credibility takes a while to earn, but can disappear very quickly. As consumers and people become savvier they’re going to notice the lack of “full” and unbiased stories. They will start to call them out – which will be a hell of a lot of fun to observe, but will still be disheartening.

Analysts, reviewers, and the like your job is to tell the full story. Your job is to be truthful and honest. Your job is to lead us. Stop protecting companies and your friends/colleagues. Start, doing your job. If you don’t you may just find no one wants to listen to you…leaving you without a job.

Brand Tags: What People Think About Your Brand

So you think you know what people think about your brand. You have lot’s of research from Simmons, Forrester, ComScore, etc. You probably have focus group data. If you’re lucky all of that “research” has helped you create a brand architecture that helps your agency partners connect with consumers about your brand.

Well think again. One of the many new tools on the web that is empowering people to give their honest reaction about brands is, Brand Tags. Brand Tags uses an approach that Malcolm Gladwell would surely support. At random a brand image/logo is displayed on screen and you are asked to type in what instantly comes to mind.

The aggregation of people’s comments generate tag clouds that give you an idea about what people really think about your brand. As a BMW owner, I really got a kick out of their Brand Tag.

You can browse the full directory of brand tags here. Enjoy.

About
Head of Social Media at Walgreens. Interactive marketer, innovator, boat rocker, continuous learner, movie lover, risk taker, dad and all around good guy. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »