Tag Archive: Facebook

Why Should I Follow Your Business?

There are days when The Onion just nails it. Yesterday they posted an article titled, “Local Fabric Store Urges You To Check Them Out On Twitter.”

The sarcasm of the article hits on the idea that every company these days seems to be asking you to follow them on Facebook and Twitter. Restaurants, dry cleaners, grocery stores and others are posting signs in their windows that let customers know they have a presence on Facbook and Twitter.

In theory that’s great. I love seeing business realize the need to create awareness around their social real-estate. Unfortunately, too many companies simply think if they create Facebook and Twitter accounts, they’ll magically get followers. As a marketer first and an interactive practioner second, I can tell you that offline marketing and awareness tools are critical to driving social success.

Ok, off the soap box. Here’s the thing that’s missing. That sign in the window is a great first step, but rarely are the reasons why I should follow you included. Think about it. Why am I going to seek you out on Facebook or Twitter if I don’t know what I’m going to get from it? It just doesn’t make sense.

We need to be smarter about our offline marketing. The real magic starts to happen in the social space, when our offline marketing is working hard to support our online initiatives. Dare I say…our marketing needs to be more integrated? I know that’s a marketing buzzword, but I think you can see in this case, why it’s so important.

I’d love to see examples you’ve come across of companies doing it right.

Your Web Metrics Reports Are Antiquated

Unique Visitors.  Time Spent On Site.  Repeat Visitors.  Bounce Rates.  These metrics and so many more and quickly becoming less a means of determining how well your site is performing.  Unique Visitors was supposed to tell us about the reach we were generating, while things like Time Spent on Site and Repeat Visitors was all about “engagement.”  And of course, the Bounce Rate told us how appealing our site was; if you will it spoke of “interest” to the visitor.

So the formula and approach for measuring success was simple.  We run a bunch of TV, print and outdoor that has a URL in it.  Of course that URL is written in minuscule font and only up for 1/2 a second during the spot, but I digress.  All these people see this URL and of course say, hey, I’ve been itching to visit a site about erectile dysfunction, so they type it in and come to the site.  After all this is a sequential process, right?  I mean we’ve only seen the path to purchase funnel a billion times over our careers.  And then after you visit the site, you’re of course going to spend gobs and gobs of time getting all the information you need.  Then, even though you have all this information you’ll of course want to come back multiple times to read all this information again and again.

Perhaps, my favorite misconception is that more time spent on site is better than less.  I’ve seen situation after situation where the reason time spent on site is so high is because the site is to difficult to navigate that you can’t find what you’re looking for.  I think you’re starting to see the lunacy of this model.

Today, though, the means for how we evaluate the performance of a site are even less relevant because simply put, people just don’t want to spend on your website.  They’d rather hang out on youTube, Facebook, etc.  This is why brands are rushing to build real estate on those sites.  So great, you’ve built a Facebook Business/Fan page.  You have 100s of thousands of followers who spending time “engaging” with your brand on Facebook.  Well, doesn’t it reason that if they’re spending time with you there, it’s coming at the expense of spending time on your website?  So, why is it so difficult to wrap our heads around the idea that previously key metrics, like Unique Visitors, should be decreasing?

Despite the obvious reasons why these data points are less important, we still rely on them to tell a story.  Why?  Simple, because those are the numbers being used internally by brand managers (and the like) to indicate their success to their superiors.  The same KPI report being used today, is the one that was used last year, the year before that and 5 years ago.  Internally, people have been conditioned to evaluate performance a certain way and it’s too difficult, daunting, challenging, time consuming, etc. to get them to change.

However, change, they must.  And it’s our duty to help them change.  If you don’t take it upon yourself to help guide the conversation and evolve how performance is being measured, you just might find yourself getting fired for not meeting a goal that’s impossible to meet.

Facebook

I wish I could have come up with a sexier title, but honestly, I’ve got nothing for you.  I have a love/hate relationship with Facebook.  The last few days I’ve had some interesting chats with people about Facebook that I thought you might enjoy reading.

I spoke with a soon to be 30 year old about why she wasn’t on Facebook.  She’s married, has more friends than I could ever count and recently had a baby.  Oh and most of those friends are already on Facebook.  So, she’s the perfect Facebook candidate right?  I asked her why she wasn’t on Facebook.  Her response, was that she doesn’t have time to “mess around” with Facebook…she has enough going on in her life and doesn’t need yet another distraction.  Well, no doubt, Facebook can be a time suck.  This is a tune I hear from lots of people, but it’s usually people in their 40s and 50s, not those in their 20s and 30s.  Kinda makes you wonder if Facebook has simply become too challenging and cumbersome to deal with.

I spoke to another 20-something, this one was in her mid-20s.  She’s what you would describe as a heavy Facebook user. Well, with over 500 friends, how could she not be?  During our discussion I told her about my philosophy on who I choose to become friends with on Facebook.  For those of you not in the know, I abide by Dunbar’s Number and limit by friends to no more than 140.  This gave her a pause and she started asking me questions about how I choose who stays in the 140 and who leaves.  Our conversation was eye opening for her and she admitted that her own stream had become to cluttered with posts and status updates from people she didn’t really know or even care about.  Again, kinda makes you think about how cumbersome and unruly Facebook can be…especially when you simply accept “friends” like you breather air.

Lastly, I had an interesting and thought provoking conversation with a few college women about the importance Facebook plays in their lives.  One girl had 3,700+ “friends” and the other over 2,000.  I stumbled into a conversation between the two women about girl A being irritated at girl B for uploading old photos of girl A and her ex boyfriend and “tagging” those photos.  Apparently, this created a problem with girl A’s new boyfriend because he thought the photos were current.  I spent about 45 minutes talking to these women and came away with a clear understanding that Facebook isn’t just a means for staying in touch with friends; it’s also a historical archive or good and bad and a HUGE means for indicating “status.”  By status I don’t mean literally what you’re doing.  What I mean is that who your friends are, how many of them you have, your relationship status indication, etc. are ALL means of communicating preference and importance.  For these women, publishing on Facebook that they were in a relationship with boys A and B is a HUGE thing…just as it is when you indicate you are no longer in that relationship.  Who you maintain as connects and what photos you keep out there says a great deal about the “value” and importance of those people.  For example, if you keep your photos of your ex and let him/her retain their status as “friends” it gives them a VERY prominent place in the hierarchy of relationships.

Three different situations and these three are certainly not comprehensive and representative of every situation.  However, it gave me reason to think about about my own Facebook habits.  Why am I on Facebook?  Why do my connections mean? etc.  So here’s the scoop:

  1. I enjoy the fact I can choose to engage with Facebook on my terms.  If I want to be active I can be.  If I want to be a passive participant I can do that as well.  Ultimately, I’m in control of my Facebook experience.  No one else can dictate how I use the platform…not even Facebook.
  2. I am selective about who I choose to accept as “friends.”  I’m not a “friend whore” or the type of person who needs to collect friends.  Sorry, but if I don’t know you, we’ve never interacted nor do I have an interest in meeting you, we just aren’t going to be friend.  I get that some people feel compelled to accept requests from everyone.  That’s not my style.
  3. Who you’re friends and connections are does say a lot about you.  If you keep your ex boyfriends as connections you should be prepared for strange looks.  Sorry, but it’s true.  If you keep photos of exes you should be prepared to get a raised eyebrow.  Look your social footprint says a lot about you historically and today.
  4. I don think what info you contain in your bio, specifically your relationship status, is important…if for no other reason than it’s important to other people and does send a message.  If you’re in a relationship with someone you should feel comfortable indicating and sharing that.  If not, it’s a clear sign you aren’t serious and that person should feel slighted.

Facebook is more than a profile.  It’s clear, it’s part of life…and it imitates life…or rather life is starting to imitate Facebook.

Choosing Communication Options

I’ve been a horrendous communicator lately.  I’ve been using twitter direct messages when an email would be better.  I’ve been using text messages when a phone call would be faster and offer clearer communication.  I’ve opted to use Google Chat when a face to face exchange would be more productive.  For a person that’s in the communications business, I deserve an “F” in how well I’ve been communicating.

You know what the problem is?  There’s simply too many tools and platforms out there.  We’ve gotten lazy and instead of using the right platform for the right message for the right person, we simply use the platform/tool we’re currently spending time in.  Would it really be that hard to open up another tab and switch from Facebook to email? Or from email to Google Chat?  Of course not.  But, many times we don’t.

The tool(s) doesn’t make you a better communicator.  The tool enables you to communicate.  It’s a means to an end.  It carries the message.  And as we all know there’s a big difference in receiving a hand written thank you note an emailed one.  If you want to be a better communicator, don’t just rely on what the message is…think about how you’re distributing it.  Consider your audience and your intent.  In short, simply pause and give some prudent thought before you simply decide to video chat your client while you’re wearing only a pair of shorts…because they were online at the same time.  I think you’ll appreciate it and your client will as well.

The Confusion Of Facebook Community Pages

On April 19, 2010 Facebook introduced and launched a new set of pages called “Community Pages.” For the past few months I’ve been studying the new pages and working with Facebook to understand their potential. Prior to this announcement, Facebook offered 5 core types of pages:

Personal Profile Pages: These are pages for individuals who are using Facebook to connect with other people and not for business purposes. If you have a Facebook profile, this is your page.

Fan Pages: These are pages created by people that covered content ranging from activities (eg Running), people (generally celebrities) or things (eg pecific book).

Business Pages: For the most part these act just like a combination of personal and Fan Pages. They are for companies only and provided a means for aggregating information about a specific company and connecting with fans of a brand.

Group Pages: This was a catch all that allowed people to create pages around a specific interest that was generally tied to a common shared experience (eg breast cancer survivors) or as a rallying area for a common local interest (eg Chicago Lake Shore Running Group).

Event Pages: These were used just like an invitation. They contained all the information about a specific event and generally offered the ability to indicate if you would attend the event.

Please note, there are several other type of pages, but these are the major ones.

While these pages all existed for different reasons and served different audiences, there was one key element that made them all very similar. All of these pages allowed for a specific owner or set of owners for the page. As a person, you own and can therefore manage your personal profile page. The same holds true for Fan Pages, Business Pages, Group Pages and Event Pages. The content on the page was editable because there was a clearly defined owner. That owner could update photos, bios, and descriptions. They could also manage access to pages and control what features (eg discussion boards) would be included.

Community Pages are the first type of page that has no owner. The owner is Facebook. You can’t transfer ownership of the page from Facebook, edit the content or even formally request that the content be changed (even when it’s in accurate). This is because Community Pages are organic. Facebook creates them automatically and the content on the pages are derived from a collection of sources internally and externally. The biggest information provider is Wikipedia.

Facebook claims that Community Pages are meant to be, “the best collection of shared knowledge on a topic.” This is really up for debate. After all one could easily argue that a single person or company has the best collection of shared knowledge.

Community Pages are currently in beta, but my guess is that they’re here to stay. Why? Because Community Pages do 2 very important things for Facebook:

  1. The make it easier to understand what users really like? For example if I had running in my user profile, this will now be linked automatically to a Community Page on running. This makes it easier for a company like Nike to target me. Prior to Community Pages I could have updated the interests area of my profile to read “running through the mud and getting dirty.” While that may be true, it’s more complicated for Facebook to understand if that means I like running or I like mud or I just like getting dirty. In short, Community Pages create a smarter, simpler and better-organized tagging structure for what people like, by forcing people to customize their profiles based on the available community pages that exist. This ultimately makes it easier for marketers to connect with users.
  2. Community Pages are 100% public and exposed to search engines. This inherently will drive more traffic to Facebook.com and begin to position Facebook as a threat to sites like Wikipedia.

WHAT THIS NEWS MEANS FOR YOU AND YOUR CLIENTS

  • You now have another page to monitor as part of your Social Business strategy. In addition to your business, events, groups, etc. pages you’ll need to make sure that your Community Page (assuming one exists) is being monitored.
  • It will become more challenging for users to find your official business page. It’s possible that they’ll end up at the Community Page and assume it’s your Business Page. The need to tightly integrate social into your other pieces of real estate has become more important. For example providing a simple link from your website to your official Facebook Business Page could make all the difference.
  • Your Wikipedia page just became one of the most important pieces of interactive real estate. Making sure it’s updated, current and accurate can make a big difference in the accuracy of the Community Page
  • Each Community Pages does ask for your help to improve it. This is currently being down by allowing you to suggest the “Official Facebook Page.” It’s a fairly simple process and something you should do in every applicable instance. Unfortunately, right now, Facebook has not made it clear what the impact of doing this has on the Community Page or your Official page.

SO NOW WHAT

I can’t stress enough that these pages are currently in beta and may end up evolving over time. However, even as they evolve it’s clear that the need to treat social as a holistic entity instead of a platform specific one is a must. Wikipedia, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter, your official Company Page, etc. will all play a role in shaping the content of Community Pages. To make Community Pages work hard for your brand you’ll need to do 3 things:

  1. Ensure that you have an effective monitoring program in place that includes sites like Wikipedia.
  2. Proactively monitor the Community Pages for your brand and when possible suggest the official Business Page.
  3. Invest in social curation. This is a relatively new phenomenon, but a very important one. Social curation is the habit of making sure your content across social sites is well organized, accurate, tagged appropriately and linked to the right sites. Many companies are hiring the role of “Community Manager” to handle social curation or asking their agency partners to include it as part of their social business monitoring/engaging scope.

Fun time ahead. As Facebook says jump we all say how high.

The Next Logical Place For Facebook To Go

Facebook is already dominating the second screen and if you believe the data, they are a big time player int he 3rd screen.  But, that area they don’t own is the first screen.  Of course, by the first screen, I mean the TV.  If Facebook were so bold and the FTC allowed it, they would buy a company like DirecTV.  That’s not going to happen anytime soon, but one avenue they could pursue is acquiring Tivo.

It’s a natural fit.  Facebook now has the like button…

…and for years Tivo has had the Thumbs Up button.

But, this goes beyond iconography. This goes into the heart of the simplicity with which we can tell a company we enjoy something. The Thumbs Up is simply a universally accepted means for indicating you like something.

So imagine taking Facebook’s open graph approach and bringing it right into your living room? Imagine a situation where you indicate that you Like “House” on Tivo…well now Facebook has the means to serve up that contextual content to you when you login to Facebook.com. This of course works in reverse. If you indicate you like “CSI,” “NCIS,” and “Numb3rs” Facebook might recommend “Law and Order” to you.

As crazy as that sounds, I haven’t even touched on the fact that with Tivo you can now stream in on demand content, photos and videos from places like YouTube.  Tivo already has the perfect structure, platform and partnerships in place to make this the right move for Facebook.

If Facebook is really hell bent on world domination they’re going to need to figure out a why to own the first screen. Buying Tivo gives them the means and the first step to making that happen.

Follow Our CMO

I came across this the other day on Michigan Avenue in downtown Chicago.  It struck me and obviously made me pause.  I’ve seen other brands integrate calls to action for social into their in-store signage and point of sale collateral.  But, I’ve yet to see anything this large and in your face.

I love the direction that Express is taking, but I think they made a minor mistake.  Does the average customer know what a CMO is or who the CMO is?  I don’t think so.  But, people know what a president, vice president, stylist or designer are.

When you consider they’re in the fashion business, I thin they’ve missed an opportunity.  What do you think?

Consumers Activate In The Form Of A Helper!

By Keith Privette in Guest Blogger find me tweeting out

Consumers have become content producing machines; I guess that is somewhat of an understatement! They blog, connect, chat, email, status update, tweet, write reviews, post pictures and videos, and comment on each other’s blogs (that should be a good start).  I have been noticing somewhat of a concerning path The Consumer is taking in this ever changing world of being connected to Businesses and the “gotcha mentality”.  The basic premise of the “gotcha mentality” is that people (consumers), bloggers, social media aficionados, and other businesses (I rarely see this one but it sure would add to the conversation) go in search of the missteps, failures, and chances companies take in this new world of connectedness and flame them any which way they can, for what?  In the very rare occasion it sparks a good discussion.  So Consumers time for skin in the game! Time to put your money where your blog is!

We the consumers have been rather vocal about wanting openness, transparency and honesty of the people we purchase and use goods and services from.  So businesses have listened to surveys, case studies, and market research and said “ok we can do this!”  So the venture into the world of social media and for the next six months every blogger, every reviewer, and social media aficionado produce mountains of content and noise about all the failure, missteps, and chances businesses take to be open, transparent, and honest.  Do you see the contradiction you have set up for businesses that are trying based on your behalf?  Now I am not saying businesses should not be held account and responsible for their actions, but there are proactive ways to really truly start building these communities you have asked for!

So, you’re following a business on twitter, have a RSS feed from a company’s blog, you a fan on a facebook page and following an industry tracking website.  With all these connectednesses there are ways you should be a proactive advocate to help build and grow these relationships!  We should implore the Honey tactics here!

The first thing you should do as a good advocate is DO YOUR RESEARCH! Not all things you read or see are what they seem at first glance.  Believe me I have caught myself leaping before doing this critical step.  This first step helps you understand perspective, both the companies and your own.

The second thing to do is reach out to the company in a very proactive and calm manner.  The channel you choose and how you approach this conversation is the best first step you can take for starting a dialogue to help the community you want to build.

The biggest advices I can offer is try and make it privately to give the dialogue a chance to happen.  If the company is on twitter use the direct message or DM.  Sometimes you may have to ask for a follow which is ok to ask for.  Locate the Contact Us on the company’s website and send them an explanation of your perspective.  If a fan on the company’s fan page on facebook you can send a message through your InBox.  All these are effective channels for communicating your perspective to a company you are choosing to help.  That is the key to this approach Help!  I am making the assumption as adults we know the best approach to the communication.

Now for the payoff, to make the full circle of engagement work to really grow and build these communities for success even in the midst of mistakes, missteps, and risk taking.  Work with the company about how to express the interactions to establish true openness, transparency and honesty.  If you have a blog write about your experiences with care, kindness, and constructive appraisals and encourage people to write comments to further the conversation.  Give a tweetout on twitter about the engagement you had with the company and direct to your blog.  Write a status update on the company’s fan page and include links to helpful information.  Lastly, if the company has a blog or something like it, encourage them to do a write up on the experience also.  Once they take this action use your community of followers and direct them to this write up.

Hopefully with these few tips we can all learn to interact to calmly discuss experiences and move away from the “gotcha” mentality.  These tips will really make this whole new world of the interconnectedness of businesses and consumers really become beneficial for all that are involved.  To be open, honest and transparent I have not always taken my own advice when it comes to these tips, but about a year ago I started thinking and acting in these exact ways and believe it or not, companies truly want our help in this way.  Businesses and people (yes one thing to remember there are always people behind the channels you are choosing to interact with, thanks John Bernier for that advice!) are very receptive when you approach the interaction and experience with care and calmness to make the products and services better for the greater good.  Now I know you may think this is fluff and feely, but I feel and think we all have a chance to “#chainreact” to really make a difference.

We need to start approaching these channels from a different perspective!

Prepare For Every Possible Outcome If You Want To Win

If there’s one thing we’ve learned from Nostradamus it’s that no one can predict the future. No one. We look at all the trend data, listen to all the analysts, and road map till our fingers hurt, but our beliefs about the future are educated guesses at best.

I’ve never focused on guessing the future. However, what I have always focused on are outcomes. I really only have two talents:

  1. I can consume more information, in real time, and be able to start applying the information I’ve absorbed faster that most people. There’s a lot of people that can consume a great deal of information, but they often lack the ability to start applying it in real time.
  2. I can map out all the possible scenarios of a situation very quickly. I’m always contemplating the “what if” scenarios and how I’d handle those situations. I want to be prepared so that I don’t have to take a breath when presented with a curve ball. In effect, the curve ball becomes no different than the fast ball – because I’m ready for it.

Let’s focus on #2 for a second. A colleague of mine shared this great article from Fast Company titled “Futures Thinking: The Basics.” It’s a great article that’s “the first in an occasional series about the tools and methods for thinking about the future in a structured, useful way.” The whole article is a great read, but what struck me the most was this passage at the end:

Trying to figure out “the” future is always a mistake; it’s much more productive to think about an array of possible outcomes. Remember that the futures you come up with will almost certainly be wrong–the goal is to be wrong in a way that offers insights into present choices.

One technique that’s good to start with is to use what some professionals call “futures archetypes”–generic headlines that offer platforms upon which to build more specific stories. Four that can be very easy to use are expectations:

  • The future is what I expect.
  • The future is better than I expect.
  • The future is worse than I expect.
  • The future is weirder than I expect.

The first three are fairly self-explanatory, but the last may be a surprise. The goal with the fourth archetype is to explore possibilities that completely shake things up (a big earthquake, perhaps, or a war, or a revolution in computing power). This doesn’t mean fantasy–alien invasions and robot uprisings are probably best left to the movies–but it does mean something outside of your expectations. The phrase I love to use for this is “plausibly surreal.”

It was pretty cool to see someone else with a similar mindset as me. The author, Jamais Cascio, does a much better job than I could of applying the concept to the real business world. But, the key takeaway is be prepared for what could happen so that if and when it does happen, you know exactly what to do.

With a major focus on short term goals. You know, things like quarterly sales figures or the end of the month speeding ticket quota. We keep such a fine tuned focus on the here, now, and immediate needs that we lose site of the larger picture. By, taking our eye off the bigger picture we make decisions that are overly reactionary and designed to address a short term challenge. When we make that decision, at the time it looks like the right one, but often fixing the short term situation takes us completely off course and away from the big picture…the big goal.

We’ve seen this happen quite often haven’t we? We saw it happen with Facebook when they decided to try and mimic a lot of the functionality twitter was offering. That’s just one example, but we see it happen in other industries like the auto, telecom, and personal electronics. Companies like Palm, Microsoft, Sony, and General Motors often make very short term reactionary decisions based on the competition. We’ve seen this implode and set a company back years. Why did they make these decisions? Simple, it’s clear they hadn’t thought out the multitude of potential decisions they’d have to grapple with. In short, they weren’t prepared.

Perhaps General George S. Patton, said it best…well said it best twice, when he stated:

“Prepare for the unknown by studying how others in the past have coped with the unforeseeable and the unpredictable.”

and

“I always believe in being prepared, even when I’m dressed in white tie and tails.”

You can’t predict the future and you can’t create the future. But, you can be prepared to handle what the future may bring. That’s the stuff of leaders and that’s the stuff of great companies.

Just Because You Can Doesn’t Mean You Should

We’re in a golden age of technology and innovation right now. Truly, we are. Every day it seems there’s something new, bright, and shiny for us to salavate over. From augmented reality to QR codes and from gesture based navigation to location aware service we are seeing innovation happening everywhere.

The tough thing is sifting through all of these new bright, shiny, objects and figuring out which ones matter. It’s not a simple task. Each client, each brand, and each situation is different. Something like Facebook connect could be the perfect solution for brand X, but overkill for brand Y. I was in a meeting the other day where I was asked where are all the social media thingies for this plan? By social media thingies, which is clearly a scientific term, they meant:

  • twitter
  • Facebook
  • OpenID
  • A Blog
  • iPhone App

Here’s the problem. That client we’re talking about sells multi-million dollar pieces of hardware to other businesses. They’re a B2B company that makes roughly 10 sales a year. Adding just 1 extra sale is a win.  Those tactics and approaches just don’t work with this business situation.

There are always constraints. Often we face a time and a budget constraint. In this situation, it was no different. Given the budget, we had to make a decision. Invest X dollars in twitter, Facebook, OpenID, a Blog, an iPhone app, and a host of other trinkets or redesign the site for maximum conversion.

All the bright, shiny, objects in the world are irrelevant if you haven’t covered the basic block and tackling and addressed the items capable of having the maximum impact – you lose. It’s that simple. Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should. Just because you can develop your site in Flash, doesn’t mean you should. Just because you can develop an iPhone app, doesn’t mean you should. Just because you can crowd source, doesn’t mean you should.

Folks, I urge you to pause for a brief second and think about what the real objectives are. Then prioritize the potential solutions based on their impact and their feasibility (relative to budget and time). If you don’t you’ll just end up doing a bunch of things that while “cool” and “trendy” don’t solve the core problem.

About
Interactive marketer, innovator, boat rocker, continuous learner, movie lover, risk taker, dad and all around good guy. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »