Tag Archive: Facebook

The Case For The Return On Amazing

Over the past few days I attended the Social Commerce Strategies conference in Las Vegas, NV. Honestly, it was one of the best organized conferences I’ve attended. Well done to the team putting together the entire event.

I had the opportunity to connect with a wide range of organizations looking to turn social into a revenue generator. We heard from Dell, Coke, Travelocity, Whirlpool, GNC, Shop Igniter, Wal-Mart Labs and a host of others. The following is a summation of key take-aways that spanned the multiple presentations, panels and conversations that took place:

  1. Social is an accelerator, not a direct generator: This was a big theme and something the Wal-Mart Labs championed. Social helps you make the cash register ring faster and with greater impact, but the mistake many organizations make is treating it like it’s own revenue channel. This was akin to early eCommerce websites, where the online experience was completely separate from the in-store experience. But, as those sites evolved, the connection between online and store became greater. Social should be considered the same way.
  2. Predictive Analysis: Very impressive presentation from the Wal-Mart labs team. They believe that they can predict an online customer’s behavior with 90%+ accuracy based on the social graph data (likes, dislikes, interests, what they’ve shared, etc.) and shopping history. ShoppyCat, though low in “usage” is considered a success by the labs team because of the increased data acquired and it’s impact on future shopping experiences on WalMart.com.
  3. The Hunt For Social Signals: Social offers us signals that should guide our decisions. What someone does in social leaves a digital fingerprint. But, those finger prints are often ignored because they seem small in the grand scheme of things and we’re usually focused on large social networks like Facebook and Twitter. But, when we look beyond those large networks, we start to see signals, a la cookies, that can help us guide what content to show and when.
  4. Expressions over Impressions: A near continuation of #3, but people are now leveraging social to express themselves. Pinterest is a great example of this. The photos they pin are an expression and representation of the user. The best social experiences enable customers to express themselves. Coke referenced several initiatives for their Vitamin Water brand where they’re experimenting with this concept…some have worked and others not so much. I think Beauty and Photo for Walgreens have huge opportunity under this thinking.
  5. Pay To Play: As social networks look to monetize and in some cases start delivering shareholder value (e.g. Google+) the ability to simply build on the backs of these networks organically is becoming harder and harder. A brand will either need to invest in complimentary advertising to make people aware of their initiative or invest in better and more compelling experiences. Both cost incremental dollars.
  6. Social + Search = Gold Mine: Everyone agrees this is future. Social and search will continue integrating to provide a better and more personal set of search engine results. Brands will need to make decisions based on perceived intent. For example, if I search Walgreens Facebook Promotion, I should be driving someone to Facebook, not Walgreens.com. It seems basic and simple, but few brands are doing this. With only limited dollars to go around, it’s tough to justify driving someone to your Facebook page where the instant purchase opportunity is low. The efforts by Google+, in this area, will be interesting to watch. The prevailing thought and said by the head of social at Whirlpool was, “start thinking about your Google+ strategy and working closer with Google than you ever have before. If you don’t you’ll end up far behind.”

I presented on both a panel and a session called The Case For The Return on Amazing. The slides can be found here:

The video from slide 44 can be seen here:

All in all a good trip with lots of knowledge exchanged.

One think I did want to call out, since it came up in a lot of the offline conversations is that “tinkering” could be the next big thing for large organizations. Companies like Dell and Wal-Mart have teams dedicated to the idea of tinkering. What’s tinkering? It’s the concept of giving a team a problem, they in turn “tinker” and generate ideas. The ideas are rapidly prototype and thrust into social channels for immediate feedback. Bad ideas are dropped. Good ideas stick. And great ideas become something bigger. It’s innovation the way it should be…like a startup!

November Update Number 3

This is the last of 3 posts covering updates, thoughts and ramblings from the past 3 weeks.  The first update can be found here the second one can be seen here.

  1. I’ve had 7 conversations in the last 3 months, with large brands, all around 1 topic no one seems to want to talk about: Facebook is a “frienemy” and they’re driving many organizations to rethink how close they want to partner with Facebook. For example a few weeks ago many companies realized that their 3rd party (e.g. Hootsuite) published posts were performing horribly all of a sudden. Facebook and Hootsuite denied the situation existed. To compensate for the reduced reach, companies were investing more in Facebook’s “Sponsored Stories” advertising platform. The folks at Read Write Web did some digging, gave the situation more attention and then all of a sudden Facebook released an announcement indicating they were fixing their platform to send more “signals” to 3rd part publishing tools. Sounds shady to me. In 2012, the question I’ll be asking my team, my agency partners and any new potential partners is “help me create a 3 year exit strategy for Facebook.” More to come on this topic.
  2. Here’s 3 iOS apps to check out: Oink, Ness and Super Retro.
  3. I’ve been investing more time of late, into tumblr. Though it often gets lumped together with other blogging platforms I see it a little differently. Tumblr is for the “lazy” blogger. It’s great for bite size content. I think that’s why it excels for companies that are heavily dependent on photos. I’m going to give it a serious whirl for the next 45 days and then come up with a more formal POV.
  4. A piece of advice to folks in “sales”…especially for social software and services: please do your homework. It’s not hard to Google, “head of social media walgreens” and find out who to contact. Spamming 50 people at my organization is the quickest way to get de-prioritized. It’s lazy, unprofessional, annoying and creates a lot of extra unnecessary work for me.
  5. I’ve been attending iMedia summits for years. They’re the best conference for interactive/digital marketing and media professionals. I’ve attended the summits as a client and as an agency representative. I’m excited to announce that I’ve been asked to facilitate the Marketers Only Sessions at the iMedia Brand Summit February 5th – 8th in Coconut Point Florida. If you’ve attended a previous summit and have thoughts or recommendations, please send them my way.

I’m Back – 5 Things To Share

It’s been a while since my last post. Too long. It’s not for lack of content. Believe me, I’ve had plenty on my mind, that’s worth sharing. A few things happened that brought my writing to a screeching halt:

  1. I’ve been swamped at the office working on some very exciting new projects
  2. I broke my hand which makes typing challenging at best
  3. I’ve been doing a lot more travel than normal and using the flight time to catch up on sleep
  4. I spent the last week in Florida with the kids at Disney World

Excuses, I know, we all have them. So with all that said, rather than write an ungodly amount of posts, I’m opting to condense all my ramblings into 3 posts with 5 focus areas. This is the first.

  1. We launched 4 the first ever Walgreens Photo Blog, titled “Walgreens Snaps.” I got the privilege of crafting the first post. I’m excited about this blog because it’s content that our community wants and it’s going to drive serious SEO performance for our Photo Site.
  2. Like many early adopter brands, we launched our official Walgreens Google+ page. We’re still figuring out how we’ll use Google+, but I can tell you that Hangouts will be a major part of how we find success on Google+.
  3. First To Know” launched on our Walgreens Facebook page. First to know is about rewarding our most plugged in community members. By signing up for first to know, Facebook community members will be alerted to great deals, special offers and more, before ANYONE else learns about it. The response has been great since launching 2 weeks ago.
  4. Our Walgreens Social Media team won a Chicago Interactive Marketing Association award for our Flu Check-In program. While I’m not an award junky like Creative Directors at Leo Burnett, I think awards are a great sense of validation for the ideas we’re bringing to market. Part of our KPIs this year are 5 projects that meet the Return On Amazing criteria…with 3 of them needing to win awards. This helps keep the bar high and all of us focused on big ideas that drive the organization.
  5. Our Social Media team started as a team of 1 and now we’re a team of 7 with 2 more hires to go. Sam Ogborn and Eric Gottloeb are our 2 newest hires. Both bring great experience…REAL experience, as opposed to “consultative” experience that’s focused on theory. To go from 1 to 7 inside of 7 months…and eventually 9, definitely shows you how important social is to our organization.

Content Wants To Be Free

Content yearns to be free. It doesn’t want to be hidden behind walls.  It doesn’t want to be locked away on a site waiting for you to stumble upon it.  No, content wants to be free.  And let’s be honest, you want it to be free too.  You don’t want to scale walls to find the content.  You don’t want to leave what you’re doing to read the content.  Nope, you just want the content.  And the content wants to be found.

This isn’t about pay walls. Certainly, that’s one dimension of free content.  And I think many of us have already discussed how pay walls lead to less content consumption. It’s not that paying for content is bad. After all, we all do it, every month, when we pay our cell phone, cable or magazine subscription bills.  The concept of paying for content will never disappear. But, it doesn’t change the fact that content wants to be free and we want it to be free too.

Take HBO as an example.  For years the only way to consume HBO content was on our television sets via our cable boxes. We were forced down a path.  A path that HBO and your cable provider dictated.  Yet, HBO thrived, because in a pay for consumption world, when you have great content, people will pay.  But, as television viewership stagnated and we were given options like Netflix and Hulu, HBO needed to innovate.  Simply adding better content wasn’t going to be the answer. Charging less wasn’t going to be the answer.  No, in a world where HBO charges you to consume their content, they finally understood that content wants to be free.  They didn’t offer to make their subscriptions free.  Instead, they tackled the other concept of free…distribution.  With HBO GO, you can c0nsume HBO’s content on your laptop, iPhone and iPad.  Think about that. One service, with many options for consumption.  What’s next, HBO GO via Facebook? gMail Inbox?  XBOX?

HBO understands that content wants to be free.

I was in a meeting the other day where there was a heated debate about if the content should live on Site X and be brought to you by Brand A or live Site A and be powered by Brand X.  My POV was that it didn’t matter. Users, readers…the consumers of the content don’t care where the content lives.  They care about having access to the content on their terms and in a means that requires the least amount of friction.  I tend to believe that a great brand is one who facilities the experience.  When you’re the facilitator…the host…the brand helping customer A reach their goal, you’ll win.

In a world where Facebook and Google are the places we not only start our web experiences, but prefer to stay throughout the day, the linear model of shepherding people from one site to the other to engage with content, is simply put…dying.  As a consumer first, I want content on demand. I want it where I am and when I’m ready to consume it.  Often times, that might mean Facebook or another site.  It also might mean by device…iPhone, iPad, computer, etc.

Make no mistake, content wants to be free.  But, free doesn’t mean how much you charge.  It can, however, mean how your content can be accessed.

Check Ins That Make A Difference

Yesterday we launched an exciting social program to support of our Walgreens Flu Season campaign.  Every time you check in to a Walgreens location on foursquare or Facebook Places, Walgreens will donate 1 flu voucher, up to 200,000, to someone in need.  That’s right, it’s that simple. You check in.  We donate a flu voucher.

But, what does someone in need mean?  Well, we’ve partnered with 5 great charities:

  1. AmeriCares
  2. American Diabetes Association
  3. National Urban League
  4. Feeding America
  5. League of United Latin American Citizens

Our fans on Facebook, by way of voting, will determine what percentage of the 200,000 flu vouchers each charity receives.

For those of you who like the nitty gritty details, this is how the voting mechanics work:

Walgreens is providing 20,000 vouchers for $10 flu shots as a base donation to each participating organization for distribution to qualified individuals. So right off the bat, every charity is being rewarded equally.

But, then, each organization will receive an incremental allocation of flu shot vouchers, which will be determined by the total number of votes received. Distribution among organizations will be as follows:

  • Top vote-getter – 30 percent
  • Second place – 25 percent
  • Third place – 20 percent
  • Fourth place – 15 percent
  • Fifth place – 10 percent

There’s a lot to love about this program, but my favorite aspect is that it gives our customers 2 distinct ways to participate:

  1. Check in to fill the bucket
  2. Vote to determine how the bucket is shared
There was a lot of hard work and great thinking that brought this to program to life.  foursquare, continues to be a great partner.  Their support has been strong and consistent.  Our team at Digitas cranked on all the creative, including the development of the voting engine.  Lastly, the internal team at Walgreens stayed committed to the idea…even when we hit some large and wide brick walls.

It takes a village sometimes to make amazing programs like this a reality.  As I’ve mentioned in the past, Social at Walgreens need to deliver a return on investment AND a return on amazing.  This program, like the national redbox initiative we launched a few weeks ago, delivers on both.

Facebook Places Is Dead, But Facebook’s Bet On Location Is Alive

I won’t regurgitate what Techcrunch, Mashable and so many others had to say yesterday about Facebook’s announcement.  They were all great write-ups and I would suggest reading their fine analysis and points of view.

In short, foursquare won the check-in game. They beat Gowalla, Loopt, Google Places, Yelp! and of course the 700 million pound Gorilla, Facebook. This doesn’t surprise me. As I wrote a few weeks ago, foursquare understands Social For The Enterprise.  When you understand that aspect of social, you’ll get major organizations like Amex, Pepsi, Starbucks, Starwood and of course Walgreens to play ball with your platform.  What I mean by play ball, is that organizations are investing in foursquare, integrating into their campaigns and products, and in some cases making them the preferred partner to help drive their social and business strategy.

Ok, so now that we’ve officially proclaimed foursquare the king of check-ins, let me also say this:

The entire check-in concept and model is only 1 part of location based social marketing.  It’s a critical part, but to think that check-ins are in fact the answer to bringing social to the local level is to misunderstand consumer behavior.

The key here is consumer behavior.  Check-ins are a way of saying, “Hi, I’m here AND this is what I’m doing.”  There’s nothing wrong with that behavior.  foursquare has mastered how to make this behavior simple, fun and rewarding.

But, Facebook, though abandoning check-ins is showing that they understand the other end of the spectrum when it comes to the role that locations play in social media.  Check-ins are a forced behavior…they are.  And for that reason they appeal to a more limited audience.  Granted, that audience is probably at the top of the Forrester Technographics Ladder.  The mainstream social “network/media” user thinks about location in a very different way.  Location is about context.  What Facebook is doing is a rip off of what Google launched with Google+.  But, just because you copy something, doesn’t mean it can’t be better (VHS vs. Beta anyone?).

So what are they doing?  Well, they’re making location something that can be attached to virtually any piece of content shared on Facebook.  Think of it as tagging.  You can tag a status update, photo, etc.  For example, I could write a status update that says, “Heading out to Walgreens to pickup my prescription.”  The “Walgreens” portion can be tagged to a specific Walgreens location.  Keep in mind that’s a future event.  Cool, right?  When I upload a photo of an event or gathering, I can not not only tag the photos with the people who attended, but also the location of where we got together.  That’s a past event.  Facebook Places and foursquare focused on the I’m here RIGHT NOW aspect.  And Facebook lost that battle.  But, they may win the war, but allowing location context to be applied to just about anything.

Here’s what Facebook says on how this tagging will impact “deals” being offered:

Once someone tags where they are on Facebook, they will be directed to the News Feed. If the Place is offering a Check-in Deal, the title of the deal will appear below the News Feed story. You’ll then be able to click on the deal title and will then be taken to the claim flow.

As someone leading social for a large national retailer I have mixed feelings about this.  On the one hand, this is yet ANOTHER change to the Facebook platform for us to understand, contend with, manage, explain and learn to leverage.  I’m not trying to be a whiner here.  But, put yourself into the shoes of someone in my role.

Imagine spending a year convincing your organization (up to the CMO) that check-ins were a key trend, that Facebook was betting big on this, that KPIs around check-ins were critical, that you needed to get in-store support for deals and check-ins.  Imagine spending a year beating a drum about the value of check-ins and how local + social was the future.  Imagine spending a year convincing Sr. leaders to download the Facebook app, start checking-in and redeeming deals.  Now, imagine writing an email to all of those people saying, “so…ummm, remember how I said Facebook was going to revolutionize the check-in game and how I said we needed to invest millions in in-store signage to promote check-ins and remember when I said we should bet on Facebook because they had scale and we should ignore those foursquare folks, well…forget all of that, I was wrong.”

This is the challenge of the social space and with working with Facebook.  The speed with which the space changes and Facebook changes their focus and rules is tough to keep up with.  This is why you have to choose your partners well and have a defined strategy.

On the flip side of the equation, this presents serious opportunity for brands because deals/offers are no longer limited to just people who check-in.  This could increase the awareness of deals exponentially.  It could let people become aware of those deals before they head into a store.  This creates greater competition and a reason for companies to bring better offers to the table; that’s a huge win across the board.

These continue to be interesting times for organizations and it’s a big reason why you have to have a well defined social strategy in place. If you don’t, you’ll just be constantly gasping for air, trying to play catch-up.  Game on.

My Early Thoughts On Google+

This video from The Jimmy Fallon Show does a great job of explaining the mass hysteria around Google+:

It’s funny, but Seth Green is spot on. Others, more qualified than I, have already ripped the invite policy, so I won’t go there. We also have a large group of misguided people who are proclaiming Google+ a Facebook killer or a twitter killer or a something else killer. To those pundits, I say, you are missing the point.

I resisted the urge to publish a post on Google+ right after it came out, unlike many others. When I first joined there just wasn’t enough people using it to get a fair read. To be honest with you, there still isn’t enough people, or maybe a better way to say it, is enough of the right people using it to make a fair evaluation. With that in mind here’s 5 thoughts I have:

  1. Google+ gets a lot right.  As I wrote on Google+, “Circles seem like the key. The ability to segment your entire circle of connections into sub-circles is a game changer and honestly, aligned better with user behavior. We don’t want to share the same way with a long-time friend, co-worker, former colleague or family member.”  That’s really the killer function and it shows that Google truly understands user behavior.  But, it’s also something that Facebook could very easily replicate.  So how long will it really be a point of differentiation?
  2. The integration of Google+ into all other Google products (gmail, calendar, etc.) was the smartest decision they made.  Instead of Google+ becoming a separate destination it can now act as something that ties across all the Google products you’re already using.  Facebook can’t even start to compete here.
  3. The lack of a mobile app for the iPhone and Blackberry (yes, I know the Blackberry is dying a slow death) is hurting the ability for Google+ to scale.  With more than 40% of Facebook users using Facebook via mobile devices and similar behavior (mobile, mobile, mobile) for other social networks, Google wasn’t thinking forward enough here.  As a sample size of 1 I can tell you my Google+ usage is nowhere near as high as it would be if I could be connected to it on the go.  Big miss here that I know they’ll correct, but it needs to be said.  The success of failure of Google+ will be tied directly to how strong and simple the mobile experience is.
  4. Google+ isn’t a replacement for twitter or Facebook.  But, it is something that will redirect and shift where we spend our time.  That’s why #2 is so important.  We already search for things, email, watch videos on youTube, scheduled events, etc.  With Google+ being integrated across all Google products, Google has found a way for us to “multi-task” with Google+ while we’re doing something else powered by Google.  Time is finite, the integration approach is one way to gain more of it.  What else will they do to keep us plugged in?
  5. This is the most important thought, what problem does Google+ solve?  I still don’t know.  Sure, it’s nice.  It’s simple. It has great features like Circles and Huddle.  But, if you are already on Facebook, if you are already on twitter, if you don’t social network at all, what does Google+ provide that makes your life better, simpler, easier, more enjoyable, etc.?  The best products, the best ideas, the best platforms…the ones that succeed, SOLVE a problem.  What does Google+ solve?
I’m looking forward to using Google+ more and more, especially through the iPhone and iPad apps once they are in market.  After that, I’ll have a more in depth post covering what I think the value of Google+ is for users and marketers.

The Socialization Of Everything

As we continue moving away from the analog tools (see Near Field Communication replacing cash) of the past and present that were apparently holding us back, we’re starting to enter some very exciting and scary territory.  The other night I got together with a few colleagues for some happy hour fun and eventually the conversation turned to when we’ll eventually evolve to a culture and world similar to “Minority Report.”

4 years ago I didn’t think we’d get here till 2020-ish. I was wrong. We’re becoming more digitally intertwined by the day. As more of our data moves to the cloud and we’re simply passing it back and forth between companies, a whole world of opportunity is opening up.

Facebook Connect, as a model, was really the lynch pin and the catalyst for all of this. Facebook realized people don’t want to register for multiple sites, fill out form field after form field and give away 10 minutes of their day just to get a coupon. I know, I know, there are some people who will do that all day long. But, the Facebook Connect model eliminated so many steps in the joining process. It was a brilliant move and all companies should entertain the thought of integrating Facebook Connect to their sites and platforms. With a Facebook Connect model in place, we saw other social companies piggyback off of Facebook Connect or use similar platforms like OAuth to move data behind the scenes and let people connect quickly.

Let’s make four assumptions for the future:

1. People are willing to share to gain benefits (monetary, experiential, etc.)
2. They want limited barriers to joining, connecting and sharing
3. Companies want to consumers to share
4. Mobile sharing, which is the real opportunity, will need to expand beyond the cell phone and the apps powering them

With those assumptions in place, here’s six potential places we could see socialization take place (keep in mind, not all of these are necessarily good ideas):

1. Your car will be able to sync with platforms like Groupon Now, fourSquare and Google Offers. When you pull into a Best Buy, Starbucks or McDonald’s the car will automatically check you in, publish your check-in to your networks and serve you up an offer if one exists. Additionally, you’ll be able to use your GPS to find local and real-time offers.

2. Similar to Blippy, when you use something like Google Wallet to checkout not only will you pay quickly, you’ll automatically be checked in and broadcast exactly what your purchased, how much you paid AND be given the ability to rate the transaction on something like Yelp!.

3. You’ll be able to scan barcodes of products at retail and see what your friends have thought about the product along with the community at large.

4. When you return a product at retail there will be an automatic push to the retailer site indicating you’ve now, in some way shape or form, not “liked” the product.

5. As I wrote several months back, the next logical place for Facebook to go is the living room.  I think we’re going to see a situation that amplifies platforms like GetGlue and makes them real business drivers.  You’ll be able to “check-in” to a show or a commercial…then like it or unlike it.  That feedback will be used to inform advertisers, marketers, personal social networks, etc.  The data will live in the cloud and be mashed up with demographic data and interest data about the “rater.”  In a perfect world, that data will optimize your TV viewing experience and the types of commercials you see.

6. Will we be able to pay speeding tickets and other moving violations on the spot by tapping our phones? In doing so, you’ll be admitting guilt, but maybe get a discount on the ticket price?

Some of these aren’t crazy ideas.  Some are.  We’re in for a hell of a ride over the next 12 – 24 months.  Will marketers make smart decisions or reactionary ones to try and be the first to try something out?  All good questions, that we’re going to see answers to, very soon. Please, let’s not find ourselves in a situation where you can tap your phone on an adult dancer’s body to tip her. That’s just bad.

Reactivating My Facebook Account

Today is 2 months to the day that I deleted my Facebook Account.  I knew I’d be back.  I had several solid reasons for deleting it.  Well, let me qualify and say, that I deactivated my account; I didn’t delete it.  Yes, there’s a difference.  I remember right after I deleted it, several of my colleagues contacted me to inform me that I had just committed career suicide.  After all, how could you possibly run an interactive team and preach to clients the need to be on Facebook, if you, yourself weren’t on it.  Fair question, and something I definitely took to heart.

So at about day 3, of my post Facebook world, I decided to make this into an experiment.  A classic marketing decision, if ever there were one :)  For 60 days/2 months, I’d live without Facebook.  Yes, I realize this isn’t going without food for 60 days, but for a marketer to voluntarily withdraw from Facebook, it has similar implications.  The experiment was to challenge myself to be the clients, the stakeholders, the doubters who ask the question, “what’s the value of Facebook…I don’t get it.”  I’ve done similar experiments in the past.  For 30 days I used a feature phone exclusively, for example.  This one seemed equally as simple.  Oh, how I was wrong.

Let me preface the next few passage, by saying, I, as an individual learned, I don’t need Facebook.  I also learned that, so long as I had a brilliant team and put in the time to read/learn about the constant changes to Facebook, I was as equally as knowledgable about Facebook as I’d always been.  That said, here’s what I learned:

  1. I still can’t get over the number of people who have completely shifted away from sharing information via email, text and other forms of communication; all in favor of Facebook.  Not being on Facebook, definitely puts you on the outside, looking in.  You’re constantly the last person to learn about someone’s engagement, new baby, new job, recent purchase, etc.  Simply put, you are at a social disadvantage.
  2. The Facebook eco-system doesn’t change that often.  60 days later, even after all the hype about Facebook deals, the shadowbox approach for looking at photos, check-ins getting more popular for Facebook places, etc. it’s the same Facebook.
  3. I missed the single sign-on that is Facebook Connect.  I’ve declined registering for sites, tools, platforms, etc. because the only way to bypass the litany of questions being asked was to use Facebook Connect. Sorry OpenID, you lost.
  4. There’s a small set of people who only interact, engage, share and communicate with their “friends”via Facebook.  A few of my really good friends fall into that category.  Keeping in touch with them proved harder than I thought.
  5. I didn’t miss the chat functionality, I’m primarily a Google Chat, iChat and AOL Instant Messenger user.
  6. The one thing I missed the most was the birthday notifications.  There’s some cool and sad about Facebook being better prepared to say Happy Birthday than we are as individuals.
  7. I’m on the fence with how I was impacted by the Facebook events feature.  I missed a lot of invitations…but were they events I would have attended?  I don’t think so.

Facebook is a force that’s not going away. It truly is the 10,000 pound gorilla.  The way it’s become engrained in our daily culture, is simply scary.  As you listen to “water-cooler” conversations you realize that if you didn’t see it on Facebook, you missed it and you’re out of the loop.  Scary.

I think this experiment will help me in the future when I sit down with clients, colleagues and the like to talk about the future of social, the role of Facebook, and why Facebook is more than a website.  I have a certain perspective that I simply didn’t have before.

Our Addiction To Facebook

About
Head of Social Media at Walgreens. Interactive marketer, innovator, boat rocker, continuous learner, movie lover, risk taker, dad and all around good guy. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »