Tag Archive: Content

Content Wants To Be Free

Content yearns to be free. It doesn’t want to be hidden behind walls.  It doesn’t want to be locked away on a site waiting for you to stumble upon it.  No, content wants to be free.  And let’s be honest, you want it to be free too.  You don’t want to scale walls to find the content.  You don’t want to leave what you’re doing to read the content.  Nope, you just want the content.  And the content wants to be found.

This isn’t about pay walls. Certainly, that’s one dimension of free content.  And I think many of us have already discussed how pay walls lead to less content consumption. It’s not that paying for content is bad. After all, we all do it, every month, when we pay our cell phone, cable or magazine subscription bills.  The concept of paying for content will never disappear. But, it doesn’t change the fact that content wants to be free and we want it to be free too.

Take HBO as an example.  For years the only way to consume HBO content was on our television sets via our cable boxes. We were forced down a path.  A path that HBO and your cable provider dictated.  Yet, HBO thrived, because in a pay for consumption world, when you have great content, people will pay.  But, as television viewership stagnated and we were given options like Netflix and Hulu, HBO needed to innovate.  Simply adding better content wasn’t going to be the answer. Charging less wasn’t going to be the answer.  No, in a world where HBO charges you to consume their content, they finally understood that content wants to be free.  They didn’t offer to make their subscriptions free.  Instead, they tackled the other concept of free…distribution.  With HBO GO, you can c0nsume HBO’s content on your laptop, iPhone and iPad.  Think about that. One service, with many options for consumption.  What’s next, HBO GO via Facebook? gMail Inbox?  XBOX?

HBO understands that content wants to be free.

I was in a meeting the other day where there was a heated debate about if the content should live on Site X and be brought to you by Brand A or live Site A and be powered by Brand X.  My POV was that it didn’t matter. Users, readers…the consumers of the content don’t care where the content lives.  They care about having access to the content on their terms and in a means that requires the least amount of friction.  I tend to believe that a great brand is one who facilities the experience.  When you’re the facilitator…the host…the brand helping customer A reach their goal, you’ll win.

In a world where Facebook and Google are the places we not only start our web experiences, but prefer to stay throughout the day, the linear model of shepherding people from one site to the other to engage with content, is simply put…dying.  As a consumer first, I want content on demand. I want it where I am and when I’m ready to consume it.  Often times, that might mean Facebook or another site.  It also might mean by device…iPhone, iPad, computer, etc.

Make no mistake, content wants to be free.  But, free doesn’t mean how much you charge.  It can, however, mean how your content can be accessed.

Content Vs. The Presentation

I had a boss several years ago who said, it’s not what you say (the content), it’s how you say it (the presentation).  I never really realized what that meant until I was client-side, working at ConAgra Foods, reviewing potential agencies to work with.  As the review team was dissecting the written responses and ultimately the face-to-face ones, many of us were getting fixated on the presentation of the materials instead of the content.

Here’s what I mean.  Some agencies, chose to simply print paper and bind their response, while others chose heavier stocks of paper, special fabrics, or bound the materials in shrink wrap like a frozen dinner. I’m being serious about that last one.  One agency printed their response on a heavy weight foam-core like material, spiral bound it, then dropped the response into a plastic TV dinner style package and then shrink wrapped it.  I can tell you that there content was lacking, but we advanced them to the face-to-face final round because of it.  We “appreciated their ability to think differently.”  They didn’t end up panning out for a variety of other reasons that should have been red flags through out the process.

Over the years I’ve seen people get wowed by the presentation of the content and overlook the actual content.  Politicians are notorious for this, as are restaurants.  Have you ever been to a 5 star rated restaurant?  You know, the kind where the service is amazing, they ask you your preference on bottle or tap water (they might even offer Peligrino), there are 7 courses to the meal, and each plate is exquisitely created with certain colors, sauces and garnishing.  If you have, then you’ve probably left hungry after dining or been disappointed in the actual food itself.

I experienced this up close and personal when I first moved to Chicago.  A friend kept raving about Charlie Trotters.  So I scraped together my cash and paid somewhere in the neighborhood of $350.00 to be treated by great service and horrible food.  When I explained the situation to my friend, she looked appalled.  How could I NOT like Charlie Trotters…it’s a 5 star restaurant where the chef sends out special selects to “treat” you, the china is bone white and you’re warmly greeted the minute you enter.  My response was something to the effect of, yes, all of that was fantastic, but I only cared for about 1/3 of the meal and left hungry.

As I’ve progressed in my career, I’ve realized you can get by with poor content, but great presentation.  The key, however, is get by.  Eventually, you’ll run into a person like me, that doesn’t care about the presentation.  All they/I care about is the content.  That person will call you out, challenge you and leaving you feeling naked in a room of decision makers.  When that happens the light bulb usually goes off and even your peers realize you don’t have the skills.  It’s a scary situation and unfortunately one I’ve seen far too many times.  In a perfect world you’d have both the content and the presentation.  It’s a beautiful thing to watch someone that has both.

If you had to pick which one to focus on however, I’d encourage you to become experts of the content.  Smart people with discerning taste respect, applaud, and desire great content more than great presentation.

About
Global Head of Digital Marketing & Social Media at Campbell Soup Co. Running a marathon at a sprinter's pace. Love ironing and my

kids, but not necessarily in that order. I'm always up for a spirited conversation. These are my thoughts and ramblings, not those of my employer.
Learn More »