Opinions And Ramblings By Adam Kmiec On All Things

Bring Digital DNA. All Others, Need Not Apply.

Yesterday, we learned that Sona Chawla, our CMO and President of Digital would be leaving Walgreens. It’s safe to say, without Sona, Walgreens wouldn’t be the Omni-Channel leader, it is today. She will be missed.

Sona Chawla - Photo Credit, Chicagobusiness.com

But, what an amazing opportunity for her to join Kohl’s, in the newly created role of COO. As said in the article:

We are looking to make the connection for customers between our stores and our online experience in a way that is seamless and unique,” Mansell told Fortune. “In order to do that properly, you absolutely have to have someone who is responsible for all of those different functions.

Amen. Today, it’s a digital DNA that companies want in their Sr. leaders. Well, in Sona, they certainly picked a great one

In a world, where we talk about glass ceilings, far too often, this announcement makes me smile. There is no person, more deserving of this opportunity than Sona. To be clear, I don’t mean, there’s no woman, more deserving. I mean, there’s no person. She is, simply put, exceptional.

For me personally, I’m equal parts sad and thrilled. Sona brought me into this organization in 2011, as the company’s first head of social media. She’s also a big reason why I rejoined Walgreens, in an expanded role, in February of 2014.

It’s nearly 2016 and in so many organizations, digital, is still an afterthought. Digital talent is still swimming upstream, pushing for a seat at the table. Not at Walgreens. In the 7 years Sona was here, she took us from virtually nothing to a worldwide, recognized leader in digital and omni-channel. We’re a destination for great talent and a place that companies want to partner with.

She will be missed. But, we have such an incredible team and unwavering support for digital across the company. Frankly, that’s the hallmark of a great leader…to build a team, that’s bigger than any one person. She’s leaving us much better off than we were, when she joined, nearly 7 years ago. I’m excited for what’s next for her and us.

Do Awards Matter?

Cannes Lions

A great friend and colleague asked me:

From a “client” perspective would it be safe to say you give zero f**ks about awards that agencies win? I’m getting tired of people asking me to submit for awards and would rather do something more creative with the $10,000 we’re going to spend on applications. Either a charitable donation, or some kind of bounty that brand managers would care about and think is interesting.

It’s a great question. My perspective on this topic has definitely changed, over the years. But, I think it’s a question, just about every agency asks/considers at some point, especially when you consider the costs for award entries. Those costs become important, when you consider, they’re part of the overhead for an agency and that means, ultimately a client ends up paying for them in the hourly rate. More on that topic here.

Getting back to the question at hand, here’s my perspective on the value of awards.

  1. Ultimately the awards an agency, who isn’t my partner, wins, have 0 bearing on me. I suspect, this is the case with more “clients” who are satisfied with their existing partners. Now, keep in mind, satisfied, doesn’t mean you’re thrilled with your partner, it simply means they’re good enough that the juice isn’t worth the squeeze to entertain switching.
  2. Now, if you’re my agency and I’m your client, I of course want you to win awards, but I care more about awards that are won for initiatives done on my business, than for another client. I’m glad when my partners (agency or otherwise) win an award. I want them to be successful. Why do I care? Because, they’re both a motivator for my partner and a sometimes powerful reminder, that we’re doing some amazing things together. However, no award compensates for poor business objective performance, unless it’s so transformational that you can convince yourself it’s meaningful beyond pure dollars and cents. For many, I’m sure the Oreo Super Bowl tweet is a great example.

Awards, at the core, are like a Michelin rating for a restaurant. When you make a reservation, you don’t intentionally, go out to pick a Michelin rated restaurant. Well, unless you’re a special kind of person. Those people aside, you pick a restaurant on a wide set of criteria: location, price, cuisine type and of course availability. But, should all those things lead to a place that was Michelin rated, 3 things happen:

  1. You instantly feel validated. After all, your choice is brilliant, if the Michelin people rated it. Who can question that seal of approval.
  2. The people you bring to the dinner, can’t hate it. “Wait, you mean, you completely disliked the place with 3, yes 3, Michelin stars? Are you crazy?” Now, that said, they don’t have to love it, but they can’t hate it. In agency terms, rarely does an executive get fired for picking the AdAge agency of the year or the agency who won 6 lions for X, Y and Z campaign. Granted,  they may not get promoted for it, but they don’t get fired either. When I worked with a commercial banking client, back in my old agency days, the client remarked, “our problem is, no one gets fired for hiring Bank of America.”
  3. You invoke some amount of jealousy, which feels good, from people who know you went to that restaurant. Here’s the key…that jealousy is only generated from people who actually know what a Michelin rating means. Net-net, some awards matter and some don’t. For example, just about everyone knows what a Lion is. Not everyone knows what a Shorty Award is.

That said, here’s the 2 reasons, I do think awards can matter for an agency:

  1. When I was at Fallon, David Lubars would say something to the effect of, “awards help make sure, we get an unfair share of creative talent, from a small pool.” His point being, creative people want to do award winning work. If you’re the place getting all the awards, you get the people, you might not normally get. I can tell you, when we did EDS Cat Herders, Buddy Lee and BMW Films, you got people to move to Minneapolis, who wouldn’t normally have considered it as a place to live and work. Be it creative, strategy, tech or some other function, people want to work with the best. Awards are one yardstick.
  2. In a startup capacity, as validation and a door opener. When XYZ company launches, companies don’t just take their call, in the same way they would if a well established and known company, called. This hurdle is no different than the one that exists in buying a new car/tv/dishwasher/etc. from a company you’ve heard nothing about. But, all of a sudden, if your company is the most awarded or earned the highest/best award, you’ve got a heck of a door opener. SaaS companies have been relying on Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for, what seems like forever, for this very reason. That validation, puts them on the map and makes getting someone to take your call, a hell of a lot easier.

I can tell you that I don’t have an objective, for # of awards to win, but I can also tell you, we want to win them, just as badly as the next company. That said, if you had a choice between spending $100K in award submissions or investing that $100K into your employees, choose the investment option. Your employees will thank you.

Improve The Customer Experience, By Asking, What Is The Intent?

There’s a lot to look at when evaluating the “creative” that will reach a customer. From logos to the colors and from the photo to the call to action, there’s no shortage of things to review, critique and optimize. When you think about all the creative elements needed to support an integrated marketing campaign, this can really add up. You have the TV, print and radio elements. Then, there’s the video, banner and social components. Don’t forget about the email, paid search and in-store signage. It’s a lot to absorb.

With so many campaign assets to keep track of, it’s no wonder that we get a bit myopic when we review an individual piece of creative. “Checking” an individual piece, often means we lose sight of the overall campaign. We miss out on how this campaign is supposed to feel. We lose the ability to see how consistent all the touch points are.

This has nothing to do with this post. I just liked it.

Several years back, in an effort to fix this narrow approach to creative reviews, marketers created, “table” or “wall” reviews to regain the ability to see the forrest and not just the individual tree. Each and every piece of creative would be laid out, at the same time in a “war room” of sorts. The amount of paper that was killed in the name of “taking it all in, like the consumer will” was tragic. This approach, created great excitement in an organization, but was ultimately more sizzle, than steak.

Of late, our team is being asked, “what is the intent” of “this” element of the campaign. For example, if we have a holiday email set to deliver on 12/7 and another on 12/23, it’s not good enough that they:

  1. Have the right subject line, right offers, a proofread headline and all the necessary legal/compliance information.
  2. Look like they’re in-step with our branding standards, from the colors to the photography and from the logo to the font.

Please, don’t misunderstand. Those are important areas of focus. Indeed, we have to see the forrest (big picture) and the trees (each detail). But, increasingly, it’s becoming more imperative to first ask, “what is the intent?” That question is designed to help us understand what we’re trying to accomplish with a specific piece of creative and then link it to both the big picture and nitty gritty details. For example, if the 12/23 email is all about last minute gift ideas, would it make sense to include an offer for something that takes 7 days to get delivered? Probably not, even though, that offer is probably 100% factual and visually, in line with the overall look and feel of the campaign.

“What is the intent” is making us more accountable for the overall customer experience. When we have to think about the intent of something, we improve on how we’re evaluating what’s placed before us. We begin to see the connection between what we want the customer to do and how well we’re designing an experience that will elicit that action.

There’s no silver bullet for how to review something. But, starting with the question, “what is the intent” is a simple way to improve the effectiveness of your review process.

A Peak Into How Walgreens Creates Great Content

I’m truly fortunate to have an incredible culture, amazing team members and clear support from leadership, at Walgreens. I’ve often remarked, to be successful at a large organization, you have to be equal parts the blue sky thinker, capable of providing strategic direction, and the blue collar worker, interested in rolling up your sleeves to make things happen. You can’t be successful, doing only one.

Recently, I had the privilege to sit down with News 360, to talk about our approach, at Walgreens, for creating great content. While the nature of the discussion was focused on our efforts with tumblr, we definitely discuss, at a broader level, how we think about content.

Being Healthy Can Make You Smile

Walgreens is at the corner of “Happy” and “Healthy.” Too often we see these at mutually exclusive. Health is something we talk seriously about. It’s a topic we aren’t supposed to have fun with. But, with the growth of companies like SoulCycle, it’s clear you can enjoy and dare I say, become happy, in your quest to be healthy.

Our internal social, creative and content team is fantastic. This is a great example how we can reinforce how easy it is to be healthy at Walgreens, while delivering it in a way that makes you happy.

Also, if you haven’t already, download the award winning Walgreens app, sign up for Digital Health Advisor and check out Pharmacist Chat. Let me know what you think via email. Thanks.

Bringing Back The Joy Of Driving

The open road. The growl of an engine. The feel of the steering wheel. The swoosh of the wind, as the window’s down. Driving, can be, such a joy. Once you get out of the city, leave the stop lights behind, get past the highway traffic and find that stretch of road that’s smooth, with subtle curves and a gradual climb, driving becomes enjoyable.

What I’ve always loved about cars, is that there’s a car for every person and personality. Some like a smooth and quiet ride. Some like a loud and stiff ride. And some like something in between. Cars are quite personal.

My first car was a 1987, white, Toyota MR2. It was fun. So much fun. It looked like a dust buster, with angled lines and it was so light that you always wondered at which point you’d float off the ground, fly through the air and end up in the atmosphere. I drove that car hard, fast and often. Despite the limited amount of metal around me, I always felt invincible driving it. I sought opportunities to drive. You can bet, I was the first one to raise their hand to pick up milk, Chinese food takeout or to drop someone off. Driving was fun. It was a joy.

Following that first car, I’ve owned American Cars (Chevy), Japanese (Infiniti, Toyota, Suzuki), British (Jaguar) and German (BMW, Audi). They all drive differently. From their acceleration to the sound they make, a cars “birth place” instills inherent characteristics.

Despite owning some fun cars (the BMW 328i comes to mind) I never felt that sense of joy. That is until a few weeks ago. I had my 2013 Audi A4 in for service. While in service, I received an email from the dealership that inquired about my interest in trading in my car. I hadn’t really thought about it. The car was only 3 years old. It was in perfect condition (if you know me, you know how meticulous and OCD I am about cleanliness). And it was paid off.

After making the wise switch from BMW to Audi, I’ve lusted for an Audi R8, but at $120K+, it’s not in my reality. The Audi TT, though, was in the price range, but I’ve never been able to convince Nichole that it was a smart purchase (apparently 2 seats doesn’t make sense when you have 2 kids). But, the Audi A3 sedan recently came over from across the pond. It’s only been stateside for 2 model years. The A3 is a tad smaller than the A4 I had, but with a beefier engine and better weight balance. In other words, it was going to be a fun ride.

Audi A3

So, on my birthday, though I hadn’t thought about the idea of a new car, I traded in the A4 for a 2016 A3. Gray, obviously. Monsoon Gray Metallic, to be specific. The first drive was from Chicago to Deerfield. It was awkward. Getting accustomed to a new car always takes some time. Later that week, Nichole and I drove from Chicago to Minneapolis. While you don’t get the subtle curves and gradual climbs, you do get an open smooth road. What a drive. Every time, I drive the car, I enjoy the ride, more and more. There’s something about the way the A3 handles turns, accelerates and darts in and out of lanes that make it fun. No, it brings joy.

Joy. Joy in driving, means you look for opportunities to drive. You look past the potential for traffic. You seek reasons to drive places. I had forgotten how much I missed that joy. Gosh, I feel like I’m 17 again. It’s a great feeling. When you consider that the average US driver, spends nearly 40 hours a year, in traffic, shouldn’t you at least enjoy the ride?

I can’t tell you if an A3 is right for you. But, I would be remiss if I didn’t encourage you to at least test drive it. Perhaps you’ll then find the joy, I’ve regained.

“This Is Disney, Anything Is Possible”

A few weeks ago, Nichole and I took the kids to Florida for a well earned vacation. We stayed in the Clearwater area, on the Gulf side and had a fantastic experience. One morning, we woke the kids up at the crack of dawn and drove 90 minutes to Orlando. As the kids awoke, they remarked, “wait, this isn’t the aquarium, this is DISNEY WORLD!!!”

I’ve never had a bad experience at Disney. Much has been written about their relentless pursuit of creating an amazing experience. From the fact they aren’t “employees”, but “cast members” to the fact no cast member can ever say “I don’t know”, Disney creates an immersive experience that makes you forget that you just paid $100 for a single day ticket to one park. If there’s one story that’s always stuck with me, it’s the $100,000 Salt and Pepper Shaker passage from Randy Pausch’s tremendous book, “The Last Lecture.” Read it, then come back to this post. Yes, I’m serious.

Ok, back? Great! It was a hot day at Disney. Mid-90s, sun beating down on us, but thankfully it wasn’t overly packed. In the afternoon, following lunch, we ducked into one of the many air conditioned souvenir stores. The kids opted for “mouse ears.” And, by mouse ears, I mean, Cora got a Yoda version and John got an R2D2 version. You have to love how the Star Wars acquisition is fueling merchandising. As we were checking out, Cora noticed another park guest’s button. For those, not in the know, Disney will give anyone (yes, even adults) a free button to commemorate something they’re celebrating. This can range from 1st Visit to Just Married, and a host of other celebrations in between.

We were at Disney on June 17th and John’s birthday was 2 days earlier. Cora said, “John, you should get a Birthday Button.” John, being the honest kid he is, said, “But, today’s not birthday. It was Monday.” Well, the cast member, wouldn’t have any of that. He grabbed a birthday button, motioned for John and Cora to approach the counter and said:

This Is Disney, Anything Is Possible

He then, asked for John’s name, wrote it on the button, then placed tape over the ink, so it wouldn’t run or smudge, and then said, “Happy Birthday.”

Look, this isn’t a $100K experience, as outlined in “The Last Lecture.” I don’t know what it’s valued at to be honest with you. What I do know, is that, little things matter. They add up over time. And, a moment like this is pretty memorable. It’s certainly memorable enough that I’m telling all of you about it.

On the plane ride back, I thought about that moment and what it did for me, was, make me ask myself the question, “what would happen if everyone’s job at a store, was to give the customer a great and memorable experience?” In some corporate cultures, margin structures and store formats, that might not be 100% possible, but it’s worth shooting for.

When creating a memorable experience is everyone’s job, you end up with a photo like this, to share.

Me. Tink. A perfect match. She just doesn’t realize it yet. Damn Peter Pan!

A photo posted by Adam Kmiec (@adamkmiec) on

Sure, the kids got to meet Belle, but I got to hang out with Tinkerbell.

People. It’s Always About The People.

I spent Memorial Day in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. It’s a beautiful place with a resilient population. To continue building and rebuilding, time and again, after hurricanes ravage not only physical buildings, but an entire community’s way of life, is nothing short of inspiring.

The sun was bright. The weather, warm. The beach, perfectly manicured. The food, flavorful. I explored. I partook in some local beverages. I ate well.

Two of the places I ate at, were owned by the same woman: Edith’s and its more casual sister restaurant, The Office. Before I go any further, let me say, if you ever get the opportunity to dine at either place, please do. The menus were diverse. The staff attentive. The prices, fair. And the experiences were completely memorable.

I was blown away by how amazing the staff was. Following the dinner at Edith’s, I remarked, “I’ve never seen such a complete commitment to creating an experience, at a restaurant.” A good colleague of mine, smiled and then told me an astonishing detail about the owner of places, Edith. Every year, she closes both restaurants for 6 weeks. During those 6 weeks, she pays her staff to spend time with their families and travel the world to learn from other chefs and restaurateurs. The 6 week hiatus allows the staff to recharge, learn and become inspired for how to keep Edith’s and The Office as one of the best restaurants in the area.

That a restaurant, which relies on tourism, shuts down for 6 weeks, voluntarily, is, in itself, an amazing story. I had so many reactions. But, as I reflected on this story, on my flight back, something clicked. In 2009, I wrote, “Make no mistake, the most important asset is human capital.” I also, often remark, that a critical goal of any organization should be, to get an unfair share of top talent. What Edith was doing, in ensuring that she was getting that unfair share, by investing in the important asset in an organization: The People. The local population of Cabo is constrained. It hasn’t grown much in the past decade, while the portion of Cabo San Lucas residents that have matriculated from the United States has grown significantly. It also remains a top tourist destination for United States residents.

The expectation that tourists have, can be quite high. Their choices for where to spend their hard earned dollars, are plentiful. By investing in the people, Edith is able to attract the best restaurant talent in the Cabo San Lucas area. And, it’s that talent that creates a dining experience, worth blogging about.

A better way to sum it up, might be this often shared parable:

Investing In People

It’s a great question and something we should all be thinking about. Are we, in fact, creating an environment, where we’re investing in people to a point, where we’re able to keep the best and attract the best?

The Jerk To Value Curve

We’ve all worked with a “jerk” or “asshole”, if you prefer. The least bold, commonly stated and potentially “A lot of people say don’t fire great engineers — but they’re wrong. It only takes one asshole to destroy an entire team.” on the subject is that “you need to fire the jerks/assholes in your organization, regardless of how brilliant they are, in order to be successful.”

Of course, this statement, is quite easy to disprove. I submit the following geniuses, who also happened to be well documented jerks, for which, if removed from the organization, it’s clear the organization would be significantly worse off.

Steve Jobs
Michael Jordan
Jeff Bezos
George Patton
Thomas Edison
Bill Belichick
Benjamin Franklin
John D. Rockefeller
Jackson Pollock
Bill Bowerman
Pedro Martinez

I can go on and on, listing brilliant people, who were complete and total jerks, who were directly responsible for the successes of companies, teams, governments, the arts and humanity. Of course, when you bring up anyone from this list, especially Jobs, the response back is, “well that’s an outlier.” That may be true, but outliers are also the ones that we look at from the sidelines and wonder, “damn, how did they do that.”

This is not to say that we should aspire to be jerks or that we should tolerate jerks or that there is some pride to be had in being a jerk. But, it is to say, that the over-simplified, popular refrain of “organizations shouldn’t hire jerks and should fire all the jerks” is at best, misguided and designed for link-bait.

I see it as something a bit different. I think, it boils down to value. You simply can’t “out-kick your coverage” when it comes to being a jerk (perceived or real).

Jerk To Value Ratio

We’re generally accepting of a jerk so long as their level of jerkiness doesn’t outpace their value to the organization. We’ll accept Jordan’s jerkiness, so long as he keeps bringing home NBA titles. We’ll tolerate Patton’s indifference to “management” so long as he continues winning battles, taking back towns and increasing troop morale. Steve Jobs can a maniacal, heartless, condescending jerk, so long as he keeps inventing products like the iPhone that move the world and shareholder value.

We’ve seen this play out time and again across sports, politics, companies and life. Jerks, like it or not, are part of the success of organizations. The key however, is hiring the right jerks and putting them in the right roles, so that they enhance the organization, not tear it apart.

But, before all of you jerks start clapping, remember, your jerkiness can never be perceived to be worse than your performance or the potential performance of a replacement.

Rules For Being A True Fan

Jordan Dunks

Some time in the early 2000’s Bill Simmons wrote a fantastic article, titled, “Rules For Being A True Fan.” It’s a masterpiece. Seriously.

Before going any further, in this post, read the article, in its entirety and then come back over. Done? Good.

What I loved about his article is that it truly got to the heart of what being a fan really means. It’s about loyalty, tradition, history, suffering, celebrating, misery, hope and faith. It’s also very logical. Being a fan, is not the same as being a fanatic. The true fan roots for his/her beloved Cubs, but knows they aren’t winning a World Series, this year. A fanatic throws logic out the window and proclaims, this is the year, the Cubs win it all.

Over the years, I’ve referenced Simmons’ article often. It’s the perfect mic drop for having a debate with another sports junky. In recently re-reading it, I realized, that while still a masterpiece, it was dated. It needed to be updated to reflect the modern sports world that we live in.

I think it needs some updates to reflect the modern sports environment. Specifically:

Bill’s Rule #1: “You can’t purchase a “blank” authentic jersey from your favorite team with no name on the back, then stick your own name and number on the jersey … well, unless you want to be an enormous dork.”

Kmiec’s Rebuttal: With free-agency, one and done and players being traded left and right, I think it’s actually better for a fan to get a jersey with their own name on the back or to buy a retro jersey of a player that’s iconically tied to that team. For example, a throwback Bird jersey never goes out of style. As a Bulls fan, while Scottie got traded to the Rockets and Jordan left for the Wizards, the reality is, I never stopped being a fan. But, updating your jersey collection to reflect the current roster of a team, could bankrupt you these days. A Bulls jersey with my name on the back, never goes out of style and it always reflects that I’m a Bulls fan, for good and for bad.

Bill’s Rule #13: “You can follow specific players from other teams, but only as long as they aren’t facing your team. For instance, it’s fine to enjoy the Brett Favre Experience if you’re a Jaguars fan … just don’t get carried away and start making a scrapbook, collecting all his football cards and so on. That’s a little sketchy. And you can’t purchase his jersey under any circumstances.”

Kmiec’s Rebuttal: We need to broaden this rule. You can’t say, I’m rooting for my team in the playoffs, but I also hope another team does well, just because I like a player on that team. For example, as a Bulls fan, I can’t both root for the Bulls in the playoffs and root for the Spurs, because I like Duncan. One team. That’s it. This become woefully apparent, when you’re both rooting for you team and an opposing player, because you like him.

Bill’s Rules 18/20: “If you live in a city that has fielded a professional team since your formative years, you have to root for that team. None of this, “The Bengals weren’t very good when I was growing up in Cincy, so I became a Cowboys fan” crap.” and “If you hail from New York, you can’t root for the Yankees and the Mets. You have to choose between them.”

Kmiec’s Rebuttal: A slight modifier is needed. If you live in a city that has multiple teams in the area, you can pick none of the above. For example, let’s say you live in the NY/NJ/PA tri-state area. It wouldn’t be crazy to think that as a south Jersey resident you could root for the Eagles or as a Central Jersey resident, you root for the Rangers and so forth. The reason I’m pushing for picking none of the above, is it allows you to play the role of the heel. And we all need a heel.

Simmons Rule 19: “Once you choose a team, you’re stuck with that team for the rest of your life … unless one of the following conditions applies:…”

Kmiec’s Rebuttal: We need to add a bullet that outlines what happens with a particular player causes such shame on a franchise, that it’s completely ok to abandon ship. Lets call this the BALCO rule. If you were a Giants fan, it’s ok to leave because of Bonds. Ditto with A-Rod. Or Pete Rose. Or what happens if your team drafts Winston? Electing to root for another NFL team, if you were a Ravens fan, following their handling of the Ray Rice situation, is something I could understand.

Beyond those edits, I’d like to add a key, new rule. I’m going to call it the Lebron Law. You can root for a team, that’s not your team, so long as it is with the intent of watching someone so hated/despised, lose. This works on a lot of levels. For example, rooting for UNLV against Duke, because you don’t like Laettner. Or rooting for any team, even a rival team, if they’re playing the Cavs/Lebron. Or, my personal favorite, rooting against any team Lindros was on, because he was a dick and you never want to see him get the satisfaction of raising The Cup.

You may be wondering, so who do I root for and why?

Baseball: I’m an Atlanta Braves fan. Some context…I was born in Brooklyn, NY in 1979. I was raised by my grandfather and my mother to be a Mets fan. My dad, being raised in New England was a Red Sox fan. I went to Mets games as a kid. My favorite player was Lenny Dysktra. I rooted for “nails.” I had a signed glove. And I cursed the Mets when they traded him to the Phillies for Juan Samuel, in 1989. By the time they traded Dysktra, I was living in New Jersey, but had not yet entered my formative years. As an angry 10 year old, I vowed to never root for the Mets. My dad, the Sox fan, asked who I would root for, then. The petulant and stubborn child I was, lead me to pick the worst team in the league, the Atlanta Braves. Surely choosing the worst team in the league would show the Mets how upset I was. How did I even know about the Braves? Well, if you recall, TBS had a huge deal with them and broadcasted every single game. It made becoming a fan, at 10, quite easy. I’ve never wavered since 1989. I lived with the Braves misery thru 1990, the breaking of my heart over and over from 1991 thru 2005, save the 1 World Series win in 1995.

Basketball: The Bulls. It’s always been the Bulls. Jordan was my favorite college player. He landed on the Bulls in 1984 and the rest is history. Ironically, I don’t have an MJ jersey, but I do have a throw back John Paxson one. Outside of MJ, he’s my favorite player.

Football: Go Giants. We grew up on Parcells, rooting against Montana, Loving LT, Simms and Bavaro.

Hockey: Rangers! Hated the Devils. Grew up on Gartner, Amonte, Graves, Leetch, JVB, Richer and couldn’t believe it when Gretzky joined us. I celebrated Messier bringing us the cup in 7 and long to see a cup raised again!

Taking Simmons’ rules, I pass the test. The only potential grey area would be by Atlanta Braves choice. Although, I’m taking his passage about “formative years” as the supporting rationale.

What do you think?