<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Expectations And Implications Of Real Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/the-expectations-and-implications-of-real-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/the-expectations-and-implications-of-real-time/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-expectations-and-implications-of-real-time</link>
	<description>Opinions And Ramblings By Adam Kmiec On All Things Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: saneel</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/the-expectations-and-implications-of-real-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3968</link>
		<dc:creator>saneel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=2339#comment-3968</guid>
		<description>Adam, I know times are rough, but you can definitely pass on the opps for 2001* social strategy at this point. that ship has sailed. i kid. anyway, like the article. as always, it&#039;s common sense driven. although i leave with the thought that clients will be more reluctant not less to enter the space. And frankly, I think that&#039;s a good thing. we can&#039;t change expectations, even when unrealistic. so, the question is which is worse? no presence or a sub-par presence. as you say, each company must choose their own model. I just have a tough time with the ones that don&#039;t invest anything to try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, I know times are rough, but you can definitely pass on the opps for 2001* social strategy at this point. that ship has sailed. i kid. anyway, like the article. as always, it&#39;s common sense driven. although i leave with the thought that clients will be more reluctant not less to enter the space. And frankly, I think that&#39;s a good thing. we can&#39;t change expectations, even when unrealistic. so, the question is which is worse? no presence or a sub-par presence. as you say, each company must choose their own model. I just have a tough time with the ones that don&#39;t invest anything to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

