<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Vs. Tweeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality</link>
	<description>Opinions And Ramblings By Adam Kmiec On All Things Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-314</guid>
		<description>@John - I couldn&#039;t agree more about the waxing and waning.  Here&#039;s a post from a few weeks back about that topic http://www.thekmiecs.com/misc/blogging-vs-tweeting/

As previously noted.  I think Peter is great.  I subscribe to his feed.  I read his blog.  I follow him on twitter.  I find him to be a great resource.

While on the whole, social media is not about thought leadership, do not people like Jason Calacanis, Scoble, etc. have a responsibility as so-called thought-leaders to provide, well thought-leadership?  I&#039;m legitimately asking the question.  I get more out of David&#039;s, Matt&#039;s, Peters, and Joseph&#039;s tweets than I do out of Jason&#039;s, Pistachio&#039;s, or Scoble&#039;s.  I&#039;m actually really disappointed with their offerings.  But, for every 115 tweets Jason offers about Mahalo, he then provides one great link...it&#039;s what keeps me following him.

I hope my post didn&#039;t come across as being critical of the contributions of people like Peter.  Totally not my goal.  If it did, my apologies.  I was really trying to explain the correlation between the rise of twitter and the frequency and quality of blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t agree more about the waxing and waning.  Here&#8217;s a post from a few weeks back about that topic <a href="http://www.thekmiecs.com/misc/blogging-vs-tweeting/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thekmiecs.com/misc/blogging-vs-tweeting/</a></p>
<p>As previously noted.  I think Peter is great.  I subscribe to his feed.  I read his blog.  I follow him on twitter.  I find him to be a great resource.</p>
<p>While on the whole, social media is not about thought leadership, do not people like Jason Calacanis, Scoble, etc. have a responsibility as so-called thought-leaders to provide, well thought-leadership?  I&#8217;m legitimately asking the question.  I get more out of David&#8217;s, Matt&#8217;s, Peters, and Joseph&#8217;s tweets than I do out of Jason&#8217;s, Pistachio&#8217;s, or Scoble&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m actually really disappointed with their offerings.  But, for every 115 tweets Jason offers about Mahalo, he then provides one great link&#8230;it&#8217;s what keeps me following him.</p>
<p>I hope my post didn&#8217;t come across as being critical of the contributions of people like Peter.  Totally not my goal.  If it did, my apologies.  I was really trying to explain the correlation between the rise of twitter and the frequency and quality of blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamkmiec</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-5064</link>
		<dc:creator>adamkmiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-5064</guid>
		<description>@John - I couldn&#039;t agree more about the waxing and waning.  Here&#039;s a post from a few weeks back about that topic http://www.thekmiecs.com/misc/blogging-vs-tweeting/

As previously noted.  I think Peter is great.  I subscribe to his feed.  I read his blog.  I follow him on twitter.  I find him to be a great resource.

While on the whole, social media is not about thought leadership, do not people like Jason Calacanis, Scoble, etc. have a responsibility as so-called thought-leaders to provide, well thought-leadership?  I&#039;m legitimately asking the question.  I get more out of David&#039;s, Matt&#039;s, Peters, and Joseph&#039;s tweets than I do out of Jason&#039;s, Pistachio&#039;s, or Scoble&#039;s.  I&#039;m actually really disappointed with their offerings.  But, for every 115 tweets Jason offers about Mahalo, he then provides one great link...it&#039;s what keeps me following him.

I hope my post didn&#039;t come across as being critical of the contributions of people like Peter.  Totally not my goal.  If it did, my apologies.  I was really trying to explain the correlation between the rise of twitter and the frequency and quality of blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t agree more about the waxing and waning.  Here&#8217;s a post from a few weeks back about that topic <a href="http://www.thekmiecs.com/misc/blogging-vs-tweeting/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thekmiecs.com/misc/blogging-vs-tweeting/</a></p>
<p>As previously noted.  I think Peter is great.  I subscribe to his feed.  I read his blog.  I follow him on twitter.  I find him to be a great resource.</p>
<p>While on the whole, social media is not about thought leadership, do not people like Jason Calacanis, Scoble, etc. have a responsibility as so-called thought-leaders to provide, well thought-leadership?  I&#8217;m legitimately asking the question.  I get more out of David&#8217;s, Matt&#8217;s, Peters, and Joseph&#8217;s tweets than I do out of Jason&#8217;s, Pistachio&#8217;s, or Scoble&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m actually really disappointed with their offerings.  But, for every 115 tweets Jason offers about Mahalo, he then provides one great link&#8230;it&#8217;s what keeps me following him.</p>
<p>I hope my post didn&#8217;t come across as being critical of the contributions of people like Peter.  Totally not my goal.  If it did, my apologies.  I was really trying to explain the correlation between the rise of twitter and the frequency and quality of blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>John Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Surely one of the delights of social media is how your interest in specific social media applications grows and wanes over time.

I am so in to Twitter at the moment as a way of learning how to develop a community. But tomorrow, it could be that I am back to Delicious and FriendFeed. I don&#039;t feel guilt about this at all!

From the other end, as long as those I follow continue to deliver their thoughts and ideas via whatever means - blogs or Twitter - then I feel content. If one of them is less good for a period, that is just fine with me.

As for Peter Kim. I have been collaborating with him over his list of companies using social media to market themselves. Both our blogs and Twitters have been crucial to that process. So social media is not just about thought-leadership. It is also about interaction whatever the medium.

So, Adam, I admire your posting enormously. I just think there are positives as well as negatives in the situation you describe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely one of the delights of social media is how your interest in specific social media applications grows and wanes over time.</p>
<p>I am so in to Twitter at the moment as a way of learning how to develop a community. But tomorrow, it could be that I am back to Delicious and FriendFeed. I don&#8217;t feel guilt about this at all!</p>
<p>From the other end, as long as those I follow continue to deliver their thoughts and ideas via whatever means &#8211; blogs or Twitter &#8211; then I feel content. If one of them is less good for a period, that is just fine with me.</p>
<p>As for Peter Kim. I have been collaborating with him over his list of companies using social media to market themselves. Both our blogs and Twitters have been crucial to that process. So social media is not just about thought-leadership. It is also about interaction whatever the medium.</p>
<p>So, Adam, I admire your posting enormously. I just think there are positives as well as negatives in the situation you describe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-5051</link>
		<dc:creator>John Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-5051</guid>
		<description>Surely one of the delights of social media is how your interest in specific social media applications grows and wanes over time.

I am so in to Twitter at the moment as a way of learning how to develop a community. But tomorrow, it could be that I am back to Delicious and FriendFeed. I don&#039;t feel guilt about this at all!

From the other end, as long as those I follow continue to deliver their thoughts and ideas via whatever means - blogs or Twitter - then I feel content. If one of them is less good for a period, that is just fine with me.

As for Peter Kim. I have been collaborating with him over his list of companies using social media to market themselves. Both our blogs and Twitters have been crucial to that process. So social media is not just about thought-leadership. It is also about interaction whatever the medium.

So, Adam, I admire your posting enormously. I just think there are positives as well as negatives in the situation you describe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely one of the delights of social media is how your interest in specific social media applications grows and wanes over time.</p>
<p>I am so in to Twitter at the moment as a way of learning how to develop a community. But tomorrow, it could be that I am back to Delicious and FriendFeed. I don&#8217;t feel guilt about this at all!</p>
<p>From the other end, as long as those I follow continue to deliver their thoughts and ideas via whatever means &#8211; blogs or Twitter &#8211; then I feel content. If one of them is less good for a period, that is just fine with me.</p>
<p>As for Peter Kim. I have been collaborating with him over his list of companies using social media to market themselves. Both our blogs and Twitters have been crucial to that process. So social media is not just about thought-leadership. It is also about interaction whatever the medium.</p>
<p>So, Adam, I admire your posting enormously. I just think there are positives as well as negatives in the situation you describe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-307</guid>
		<description>@Adam - totally agree on personal opinion.  I encourage you to look at the first 20 posts by some of your favorite authors.  Then look at the most recent 20.  I&#039;d bet my hat (it&#039;s a nice one, though not as nice as David&#039;s) that the frequency has gone done, the length of the post has gone down, and perceived value has gone down.

This doesn&#039;t mean they aren&#039;t providing value.  For some of my favorite bloggers, this is like MJ going form a 36 point per game scorer to a 32 point per game scorer.  In scoring less he rebounded more and played better defense.  If you will he became a better all around contributor.

The same could be said for all the people I referenced.  Matt Dickman provides a tremendous amount of value on twitter and his blog.  I learned about the umbrella site via his blog.  His contribution on understanding Facebook&#039;s audience was amazing.  The writing of that guide took far more time than the actual blog post.  The quality came in the work he compiled, not the post itself.  Well for me it did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam &#8211; totally agree on personal opinion.  I encourage you to look at the first 20 posts by some of your favorite authors.  Then look at the most recent 20.  I&#8217;d bet my hat (it&#8217;s a nice one, though not as nice as David&#8217;s) that the frequency has gone done, the length of the post has gone down, and perceived value has gone down.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t providing value.  For some of my favorite bloggers, this is like MJ going form a 36 point per game scorer to a 32 point per game scorer.  In scoring less he rebounded more and played better defense.  If you will he became a better all around contributor.</p>
<p>The same could be said for all the people I referenced.  Matt Dickman provides a tremendous amount of value on twitter and his blog.  I learned about the umbrella site via his blog.  His contribution on understanding Facebook&#8217;s audience was amazing.  The writing of that guide took far more time than the actual blog post.  The quality came in the work he compiled, not the post itself.  Well for me it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamkmiec</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-5057</link>
		<dc:creator>adamkmiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-5057</guid>
		<description>@Adam - totally agree on personal opinion.  I encourage you to look at the first 20 posts by some of your favorite authors.  Then look at the most recent 20.  I&#039;d bet my hat (it&#039;s a nice one, though not as nice as David&#039;s) that the frequency has gone done, the length of the post has gone down, and perceived value has gone down.

This doesn&#039;t mean they aren&#039;t providing value.  For some of my favorite bloggers, this is like MJ going form a 36 point per game scorer to a 32 point per game scorer.  In scoring less he rebounded more and played better defense.  If you will he became a better all around contributor.

The same could be said for all the people I referenced.  Matt Dickman provides a tremendous amount of value on twitter and his blog.  I learned about the umbrella site via his blog.  His contribution on understanding Facebook&#039;s audience was amazing.  The writing of that guide took far more time than the actual blog post.  The quality came in the work he compiled, not the post itself.  Well for me it did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam &#8211; totally agree on personal opinion.  I encourage you to look at the first 20 posts by some of your favorite authors.  Then look at the most recent 20.  I&#8217;d bet my hat (it&#8217;s a nice one, though not as nice as David&#8217;s) that the frequency has gone done, the length of the post has gone down, and perceived value has gone down.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t providing value.  For some of my favorite bloggers, this is like MJ going form a 36 point per game scorer to a 32 point per game scorer.  In scoring less he rebounded more and played better defense.  If you will he became a better all around contributor.</p>
<p>The same could be said for all the people I referenced.  Matt Dickman provides a tremendous amount of value on twitter and his blog.  I learned about the umbrella site via his blog.  His contribution on understanding Facebook&#8217;s audience was amazing.  The writing of that guide took far more time than the actual blog post.  The quality came in the work he compiled, not the post itself.  Well for me it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-306</guid>
		<description>@ Mark - Not evil...well ok, maybe a little bit evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mark &#8211; Not evil&#8230;well ok, maybe a little bit evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamkmiec</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-5056</link>
		<dc:creator>adamkmiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-5056</guid>
		<description>@ Mark - Not evil...well ok, maybe a little bit evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mark &#8211; Not evil&#8230;well ok, maybe a little bit evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-305</guid>
		<description>@Marc - I&#039;ve seen similar things.  Many of my more thoughtful posts originated from a dialogue I watched or participate in on twitter.  Twitter provides a great springboard for inspiration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marc &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen similar things.  Many of my more thoughtful posts originated from a dialogue I watched or participate in on twitter.  Twitter provides a great springboard for inspiration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Singer</title>
		<link>http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekmiecs.com/?p=778#comment-308</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I notice this and haven&#039;t noticed a drop in quality on those sites.  Might be my personal opinion, but those people especially use the separate platforms for completely different purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I notice this and haven&#8217;t noticed a drop in quality on those sites.  Might be my personal opinion, but those people especially use the separate platforms for completely different purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

