Monthly Archives: May 2009

The Secret Of Viral Video Success

Content + Distribution.

You need great content and a great distribution plan. Too often companies have only one of the two. If you have a great video, but are only putting it up on YouTube, you’re missing out. Sure YouTube is the 10,000 pound Gorilla, but there are a variety of other amazing video sites. For example Vimeo, Daily Motion, and MetaCafe.

But, it goes beyond just uploading a video. You can’t simply upload and pray for it to catch on. You need to have a distribution strategy. Part of the distribution strategy is where you upload the video. The other part is how you make people aware of it’s existence. This includes blogger relations, traditional media outlets, social platforms, and even paid media.

The flip side of this are the situations where companies have a brilliant distribution strategy, but horrible content. That my friends is the quickest way to being ridiculed and not finding success.

Long story short, viral success doesn’t have to be a guessing game. It can be formulaic and predictable. All you need is a great content and a great distribution strategy.

Trading Your Personal Information

Every day we trade our personal information for something. Our grocery “loyalty” cards provide companies access to our purchase behavior. The email newsletter from All Recipes gets your name, email address, physical address, and cooking habits. Heck when you buy dinner with a credit card you’re trading away your personal information.

Companies want more of your information. They’ve always wanted more of your information. More data and better data leads to smarter business decisions, more precise targeting, and of course a better return on investment. Simply put, without your data, companies would be guessing about who’s buying, what they’re buying, and would be blindly guessing about where to put their money. Come to think of it, aren’t lots of companies doing that right now :)

But seriously, you are valuable. Well, actually, your data is valuable. As budgets shrink and accountability rises your data becomes even more valuable. If something is valuable, it often means it’s worth paying for. Which begs the question, at what point will we be able to trade our information like commodity or stock exchange?

At the iMedia Agency Summit in Austin, Texas a gentleman from Blue Kai speculated that in the near future you’ll be able to trade your personal information for a trip to Hawaii. The term personal information is loose. You won’t be trading basic information like name, date of birth, and email address for that trip. Nope, you’ll be trading information about where you ate, what you saw, what you bought, why you bought, how many fruity drinks you drank, what music you listened to, and why you ordered octopus when according to what they already know about you, you’re allergic to seafood.

Some people will find sharing that information a fair even exchange. Others will balk at the concept. Me, I’m game. I’d gladly trade a bunch of my personal information for a new BMW M3.

Are you game? What would you trade for a new car or a trip to Hawaii? Would you sell your information? Your middle name might have little value on the exchange, but…allowing someone to monitor your web surfing habits for a year could be worth thousands. Along those lines, would trade your web surfing behavior for free internet? What about your tv viewing habits for free cable?

As consumers become smarter and realize that their personal information is quite valuable they’ll do one of two things:

  1. Protect that information, making it harder for companies to learn about customers
  2. Demand compensation for access to the information

That’s going to change the entire dynamic of the company-customer relationship. It’s going to be fun. BMW, I eagerly await my new M3.

The Right Hand Needs To Talk To The Left Hand

In corporate culture we have dozens if not hundreds of “sayings” that are supposed to demonstrate to employees how simple business is. For example, the left hand needs to be talking to the right hand. Makes sense, right?

Ok, well I love when we see great examples of the right hand clearly not talking to the left hand. Ever since I was working at ConAgra Foods I’ve had my eye on Del Monte. Recently, they’ve been in the news quite a lot. On May 18th, Doug Chavez, the Senior Manager for Digital Media at Del Monte participated in a simulated contest at the Interactive Advertising Bureau’s Social Media Conference. The simulation enabled “sellers” like John Battelle to pitch a “buyer” like Chavez with ideas that leveraged Social Media.

As you all know, I’m not a digital evangelist. In fact I’m more of a realist. I’m the guy who tells people, “hey it’s great that you like twitter, but it doesn’t fit for this project.” But, I’ve also been around long enough to be forward looking. I was amazed at Chavez’s response to the proposals and social media in general. Specifically, here’s what he said:

“How we pulse (social) media though the year and how we track that is a challenge for us, because at the end of the day, what did you do for market share — what did you do for sales volume?”

I could go on and on about how you can’t PULSE social media, but that’s a conversation for a different day.

Look, I’m all for ROI. When you’re client side you hear a lot about ROI and in digital you hear about it every day.  Thankfully, I was fortunate enough work for Joan Chow at ConAgra Foods. She introduced the concept of ROMO, the return on marketing objective. Sometimes things are about the marketing objective. For example brand awareness is a marketing objective not a sales one. In theory higher awareness leads to sales, but not always.

Perhaps my favorite example of a company starting out with a ROMO plan that ultimately become a huge ROI story was Nike’s Live Strong brand. The goal of live strong was not to make a profit it was to raise awareness about cancer and Lance Armstrong’s support for cancer research. Suffice it to say, Live Strong evolved into a massive worldwide movement.

If all you care about are immediate sales, just drop a bunch of FSIs. Companies have been doing this for years.  But, that’s not the answer either.  According to Chavez, he doesn’t really care for the coupon. He stated, “How do you go from someone just getting a coupon to go beyond that and becoming a brand loyalist?”

Great question. We all want loyalty. It’s the holy grail of marketing. Oddly enough, Del Monte is leveraging social media to make this happen. At the very same conference, but at a different event, Josh Bernoff, of Forrester and author of Groundswell shared how Del Monte tapped into social media to drive the development of a new product. Check out the 3 minute video here.

Del Monte, crowd sourced the development of a new product.  Brilliant.  They created a community for dog lovers. The community become a great real time focus group.  Through that community they were able to source feedback and give the people what they want.  That’s how you get from social media investment, to awareness, to sales, to loyalty.

This is also a case of the  left hand not talking to the right hand. We have one person at Del Monte seemingly opposed to social media, while we have another group fired up and getting involved.

I point this out, not to make fun, chastise, or to be mean. Quite the contrary. This situation is exactly the type of disconnect taking place at companies (client side and agencies) across the world. With one hand we’re demanding results from a concept that’s less than 18 months old. And with the other hand we’re investing, because we see potential and realize if we don’t invest now, it’ll be too costly to play catch up later.

Buying into social media is as much a cultural shift for companies as it is a marketing shift. These two examples from the same conference highlight we still have a long way to go.

Please note, I did not attend the IAB’s conference in person. The quotes from Doug Chavez come directly from MediaPost’s coverage of the event here.

Always Connected

I’m not an Apple fanboy. I don’t really care for AT&T’s service, coverage, or plan pricing. But, I love being always connected to the web. The iPhone keeps me connected to just about everything and everyone I care about. Facebook, Twitter, and my own site are all just a tap away.

Lately, I’ve been using a laptop connect car for work travel. Conceptually it’s a great idea. I can work from a car, an airport, or a field in the middle of nowhere. Unfortunately, there’s one problem. The laptop connect cards don’t give you unlimited access to the web like the iPhone does. Our Verizon cards cap our use at 5gb a month. I can eat through 5gb ridiculously fast. It’s just not a fair limit.

I don’t want my internet access limited. I want unfettered access. As I look forward 18 months I can totally see myself using my iPhone exclusively and never using my laptop. The iPhone will undoubtedly become more powerful and have a longer battery life. When that happens why would anyone keep using a laptop, pay for internet access at home, and pay for a laptop connect card and plan? It just doesn’t make sense.  The iPhone’s continued evolution towards being a mini-PC and unlimited access to the web will stunt any potential netbook growth.

If laptops/netbooks want to thrive they need to enable us to be always connected.  But, they can’t do it alone.  It’s going to take an investment in infrastructure (national WiFi) and a change to how companies like AT&T price out their laptop connect card plans.

Am I crazy?

What I Learned At The iMedia 2009 Austin Summit

Every year I leave the iMedia summit amazed and impressed with the people and companies in our industry. This year’s summit in Austin, TX was no different. Over the course of 4 days I absorbed enough information to make my head hurt…in a good way. it would take me days to condense everything that was covered into a post. With that in mind, here’s the top 10 things I’m taking away from the summit.

  1. Real Estate Is King: It’s not enough to have a cool app or a great site. In fact, the best apps are the ones based on an existing community. Why? Because they extend the community from the mother ship and in doing so introduce a whole new set of people to the community.
  2. Visual Expression Of Data Is Critical: Sure, you can have the MOST data, but if nobody can make sense of it, what value is there? I sat through a presentation from Trulia. They realized everybody had the same basic information, but no company had cracked the code on a great user experience. Their focus was on the end user; not collecting more real estate listings than the competition.
  3. Display Ads Are Not Dead: In fact with enhancements like Yahoo! Smart Ads we could start to see a resurgence of banners. The beauty of the Smart Ad is that the ads are essentially built on the fly for each user based on a preset bank of assets and algorithm. In other words, we’re not showing the same ad to every single person.
  4. There’s No Silver Bullet For ROI: We can measure just about anything online, but for the most part we’re measuring it in isolation. The holy grail of measurement would be a system that can cut across digital, TV, print, outdoor, etc.; however, there really isn’t a system in place that can do that for every client at scale. The key to measuring on the web is to define the end result and start determining what you can measure between the web and that end result.
  5. People On Twitter Are Real People: I know it sounds far fetched. But, seriously, over the course of 4 days I traded a lot of tweets with fellow summit attendees. That lead to me meeting to really cool people, Adam Kleinberg and Steve Smith. Steve, totally helped me out of a bind. Using the #imediasummit tag I tweeted on Tuesday that I was in need of a blank CD. Steve was scanning the stream, saw my tweet, and offered to bring me one. He over delivered and gave me 2.
  6. Content and Stories: What really gets people interested in what you have to say as a brand is great content and compelling stories. You can’t have one without the other. Nike has known this for years. It’s what makes their work so outstanding. However, and granted I’m biased, there’s no better example of content + story than BMW FIlms. If we really want our consumers to seek us out we need to up the quality of our content and our story telling.
  7. Mobile Is Kinda Big: I’ve been hearing that mobile is big for a few years now. As an interactive marketer, I’m supposed to love the bright shiny objects. I started to get religion on mobile 2 years ago when data showed consumers sent 363 billion text messages. However, most companies have been slow to invest in mobile. Here’s what I can tell you. Back in 1997/8 people questioned the need for a web site, now you’d be thrown out on your ear if your company didn’t have one. Playing catch up online is a costly proposition and I get the feeling playing catchup in mobile will be even more costly.
  8. “Viral” Doesn’t Have To Happen By Chance: If you really want something to take off you need a smart distribution plan. Companies like Digital Broadcasting Group excel in making sure your video content is seen by people beyond YouTube. It’s not hat YouTube isn’t big or important. It’s clearly a dominant player. However, companies continue to think that all they need to do to make something go “viral” is upload a video to YouTube.
  9. Talent Remains A Problem: I heard it repeatedly from all my agency counter parts. As clients invest more in digital, agencies are desperately trying to find and retain top talent. But, it’s not easy, because there’s just not a lot of outstanding digital talent out there. Most seemed to agree that there was an over saturated market of average talent. But, clients don’t want average, they want the best…even if they don’t know how to use the best to their full potential.
  10. No One Has It Figured Out: Companies have case studies. They have 1 or 2 shining examples of a flawless program/campaign. But, there isn’t a single company hitting it out of the park every single time. Those that have speak to 3 things: right client, right team, and right time. You need a client that’s willing to let magic happen. You’ve got to a have a team capable of delivering magic. And, the timing has to to be right; for example a twitter program 3 years ago would have failed. It takes all of those elements and a little bit of luck.

That’s it. Good stuff as usual from iMedia. If you’ve never attended a summit I highly recommend you find a way to attend a future one.

Tell Great Stories And Have Great Content

You get some amazing presenters at iMedia. Tonight our dinner time presenter was Bod Mason of National Geographic. Over the course of an hour he shared stories, photos, and video of his many adventures. To say, that he’s been just about everywhere would be an understatement. In the last year alone he traveled to all 7 continents. Not bad, huh?

During a critical point in the presentation he paused and shared the secret of why National Geographic continues to be a leader in the industry.  After all – anyone can travel to Africa with great photography gear and a guide.  Other magazine employ top notch photographers to places like Antartica, but they just don’t rival National Geographic.  So, why is it that National Geographic remains at the top of heap?

Simple – they focus on telling great stories that have great content.  You need BOTH.  Having a great photo, with no story is only half of the equation.  To me that’s the key to making a great ad.  When the visuals are impactful and the story compelling; people want to watch.  They want to spend some time with you.  Hell, they’ll pay to spend time with you.

If I’ve taken anything away from this summit, it’s that as marketers we need to tell great stories and offer great content if we want our audience to actively participate and engage with our brands and products.

iMedia Agency Summit 2009

I’m thrilled to be attending another iMedia summit.  Kevin Doohan first introduced me to iMedia roughly 4 years ago. Since attending my first summit, I’ve been a fixture at these summits; generally trying to attend at least 1 summit a year.

iMedia is probably the premier event for interactive marketers. The events are invite only, attendance is limited, the locations are amazing, and the content top notch. It blows away other conferences like AdTech.

The thing I like the most about iMedia is that it’s a truly humbling experience. I always find myself leaving the summits thinking, “damn, I still have so much more to learn and so much further to go.” It’s the humility that keeps me hungry and wanting to be better. As I’ve mentioned; I’m work in progress.

Spending 3 days away from the office is rather complex. You’re employer and senior leadership have to recognize the value in you attending. Equally as important is the trust you have to have in your team to over achieve while you’re out of the office. It’s a delicate balance – because to get the most out of the summit, you really need to be immersed 24/7 in the summit’s content (that includes the people).

I’m really excited about getting to meet some new people; I always find a handful of people that become long time colleagues, friends, and sounding boards. One of things you quickly realize after attending a summit is that we’re ALL in this together. We all have the same challenges. And, we all need some help. The number of outstanding interactive marketers is small. It’s a tiny, small knit community. I’m looking forward to meeting new and old members of that fraternity at the iMedia Agency Summit in Austin, TX.

I’ll be live tweeting many of the sessions. If you weren’t able to attend the summit, but want to get a flavor for what’s being discussed, follow my tweets.

Texas, here I come.

Barry Judge On Interactive And Social Media

I continue to be impressed by Barry Judge, Best Buy, and their whole approach to interactive. This video is amazing, inspiring, and should be something all companies, agencies, and people watch.

The Next Evolution Of Publishing – Or How I Can Save Traditional Media

You know that scene in every action movie where someone says, “you know, it’s so crazy, it might work.” Well, this is one of the scenes. Tools like WordPress, Blogger, and Drupal have empowered everyone to be a potential publisher. That’s right, YOU, can make and report on the news…or just about anything for that matter.

News networks like CNN have even created programs that let the public create the news.  The day Google News started including blogs with traditional news publications (eg WSJ and NY Times), it was clear something was changing…or maybe it had changed. Individuals were now being given near instant credibility by Google. Very cool.

The media outlets like Fox, MSNBC, and Tribune Co. continue to have their journalistic credibility questioned. This happened throughout the 2008 presidential election. Hell, it’s still happening if you listen to the jokes at the White House Correspondence Dinner.

OK so we have:

  1. Technology enabling people to become self publishers
  2. New networks leveraging people for stories
  3. Individuals being given near equal credibility to long established publications
  4. A certain level of public mis-trust of the media

So what am I missing? Oh, two other things:

  1. The concept of personal branding is at an all time high
  2. Newspapers are closing down left and right

This is the part now, where I lean in, and almost with a whisper say, “I’ve got an idea so crazy, it might just work.”

I want to turn the publishing model upside down. I think people would pay publishers to let them have a daily, weekly, or monthly column. Yeap, that’s right I think people would pay the NY Post to have their name seen in ink. REAL INK. Not just digital ink, but real ink on paper.

Think I’m crazy? Ok, walk with me for a second. Companies are always pitching publications for a chance to have a featured column. Really. Companies kill themselves trying to get 1,000 words. You know why? Because their name and their company in a publication carries clout with the industry, analysts, clients, etc.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a mutual exchange taking place when it actually happens. AdAge for example gets great content from Steve Rubel, that their readers want to read. In exchange Steve is able to build his brand and Edelman’s. Seems like a fair exchange.

I think this could work. It’s a win-win. People build their personal brands, the publications/newspapers/etc. get fresh content and a revenue stream, and the public hears from real people.

So that’s my plan. Wall Street Journal – I’ll pay you $12,000 annually for a weekly column. You game?

I’m Work In Progress

In the movie, A Bronx Tale, Colagero (Deniro’s character’s son) laments, “The saddest thing in life is wasted talent, and the choices that you make will shape your life forever.” I don’t have many talents. If this were the movie Rudy, you’d hear the janitor saying to me, “Adam, your 5 foot nothing, a 100 and nothing, without a shroud of athletic ability…”

There’s really only one talent I have and unfortunately it’s not the ability to fly. No, my talent is the insane ability to quickly absorb and subsequently process mass amounts of information. On a given day, I read anywhere from 5,000 – 7,000 tweets and 100 – 150 posts/articles. All those links I share via twtter are all things I’m reading or read. It’s not just the reading though. Lots of people can speed read. But, for whatever reason, I can digest the info and almost at the same time begin thinking about how to apply it to some challenge. Why this is, I have no idea. But, I’m thankful every day that I can do it. I know, it’s a lame talent, but it’s what I was given.

I’m not perfect. I’m not even in perfect’s shadow. I’m not an expert either. In fact, on my best day, I’m insanely frustrated with myself for not being better. It’s the thought that I can’t be flawless and yet the industry, my clients, my team, and I expect it that keeps me on a relentless pursuit to be better.

Every day you see me, talk to me, trade a tweet with me – I’m work in progress. Hopefully, I’m better on that day than I was the day before. In our industry we hate sharing work in progress. After all work in progress isn’t perfect. It isn’t ready to be shared. It can be unfairly critiqued because it’s not the final perfect product.

Me, I like the feedback. I like being judged. It makes me hungrier. I take the feedback, process it, and figure out how I can use it to make be better. I’m trying not to waste my talent.

Yes, I’m work in progress. Beta, really…and I’m ok with that. It means I haven’t reached my ceiling. It means I can still be better. So you tell me – how can I get better?